匿名使用者
匿名使用者 發問時間: 社會與文化語言 · 1 0 年前

可以幫我翻的通順點嗎?最好不要直接用翻釋軟體然後貼上的

our fellow huamn beings are unlikely to reject the accolades we so generously bestow uponthem, and the other species to whom we deny the honor are unable to object.

in so doing we implicitly condemn slavery, racism, and---if we eliminate the sexist references to the"intrinsic worth of all men"---the oppression of women.

more argument is needed to justify the claim that all and only humans have some special kind of dignity or worth or are ends in themselves.On the face of it,after all,shouldn't the mere fact that a being can experience pleasure or pain be sufficient to make it an " end in itself"?

isn't the answer to this question affirmative,irrespective of whether the beings whose pleasure is enhanced and whose pain is diminished are humans,gnus,or guinea pigs?

there is a dearth of convincing argument or evidence for the existence of a being who corresponds to the Judeo-Christian conception of God,...

animals are not self-conscious and there merely as means to an end.

but his act is inhuman and damages in himself that humanity which it is his duty to show towards mankind.

1 個解答

評分
  • 匿名使用者
    1 0 年前
    最佳解答

    我們人huamn生物不可能拒絕我們如此慷慨地給予uponthem的讚美 、並且在誰我們否認榮譽不能物體的其它種類。 在如此做的我們過程中含蓄譴責奴隸制度 、種族主義 、並且 ---如果我們消除性別歧視者提到" 全部人的固有價值" ---婦女的壓迫。 更多的辯論被需要證明全部和只人有一些種特別的尊嚴或者價值的聲明是正確的, 或者themselves.On 末端是這張臉的它,, 全部,不應該這經歷快樂或者痛苦能的事實足以使它一"  本身結束" ? 這個問題的答案不是肯定的, 不管是否其快樂被提升和誰的痛苦被減少的生物是人,gnu主題還是幾尼豬? 有一使辯論或者證據給一是誰相當於Judeo克裡斯蒂安上帝的概念的存在確信的缺乏, ...動物不害羞,和那裡僅僅作為目的的方法。 他行為非人道並且損壞自己向人類顯示的他職責哪個的人類。  

    參考資料: igi8hiuj.
還有問題?馬上發問,尋求解答。