promotion image of download ymail app
Promoted
匿名使用者
匿名使用者 發問時間: 社會與文化語言 · 1 0 年前

求英文高手 翻譯 一段文章!!!!!!!急!!!!!!20點

Finally, Congress\'s statutory fiscal constraints-----spending caps and PAYGO ------expired on September 30, 2002. With the return of deficits, Congress now must decide whether to bring back these forms of fiscal discipline, devise new processes, or rely on existing legislative procedures for budgetary control. Lawmakers in both parties have been unsuccessful so far in restoring statutory PAYGO and spending growth budget rules. They have been unsuccessful in part because President Bush wants PAYGO rules to apply only to spending increases but not to tax cuts. This means that if taxes are cut, the lost revenues would not have to be offset, or paid for, by comparable revenue hikes or reductions in entitlement programs. The Senate does have a temporary and narrower (compared with the expired statutory version) PAYGO rule, created as a feature of the concurrent budget resolution. It is slated to expire in 2008. The House has no such provision, but it did add a new point of order provision to

its rules.

不想要翻譯軟體直接的全文翻譯

拜託各位大大了

報告內容 看不懂 !!!!急啊!!!!

2 個解答

評分
  • 最佳解答

    終於, 國會的法律財政限制消費蓋帽和PAYGO 到期了在2002 年9月30 日。以缺乏回歸, 國會必須現在決定是否把這些財政學科帶回的形式,

    構想新過程, 或依靠現有的立法規程為預算控制。立法委員在兩個黨是不成功的到目前為止在恢復法律PAYGO 和花費成長預算規則。他們是不成功的一部分因為布希總統要PAYGO 規則適用只嚮消費增量但不是於減稅。這意味著如果稅被減, 失去的收支不會必須被抵銷, 或被付出, 由對權利節目的可比較的收支遠足或減少。參議院有一個臨時和更加狹窄的(比較到期的法律版本) PAYGO 規則, 被創造作為一致預算決議的特點。2008 年它被提名到期。議院沒有這樣的供應, 但是它增加了新提出關於議程的問題供應來它的規則。

    2006-06-14 13:25:44 補充:

    Finally, Congress's statutory fiscal constraints-----spending caps and PAYGO ------expired on September 30, 2002. With the return of deficits, Congress now must decide whether to bring back these forms of fiscal discipline, devise new processes, or rely on existing legislative

    2006-06-14 13:26:20 補充:

    procedures for budgetary control. Lawmakers in both parties have been unsuccessful so far in restoring statutory PAYGO and spending growth budget rules. They have been unsuccessful in part because President Bush wants PAYGO rules to apply only to spending increases

    2006-06-14 13:27:41 補充:

    but not to tax cuts. This means that if taxes are cut, the lost revenues would not have to be offset, or paid for, by comparable revenue hikes or reductions in entitlement programs. The Senate does have a temporary and narrower (compared with the expired statutory version)

    2006-06-14 13:28:04 補充:

    PAYGO rule, created as a feature of the concurrent budget resolution. It is slated to expire in 2008. The House has no such provision, but it did add a new point of order provision to its rules.

    • Commenter avatar登入以對解答發表意見
  • HA
    Lv 6
    1 0 年前

    終於, 國會的法律財政限制-----消費蓋帽和PAYGO ------到期在9月30日, 2002年. 以缺乏回歸, 國會是否必須現在決定把財政學科帶回的這些形式, 構想新的過程, 或依靠現有的立法規程為預算控制。立法委員在兩個黨是不成功的到目前為止在恢復法律PAYGO和花費成長預算規則。 因為布什總統要PAYGO規則仅適用於消費增量,但不於減稅,他們是不成功的一部分。 如果稅被減,這意味著那,失去的收支不會必須被抵銷, 或付出, 由對權利節目的可比較的收支遠足或減少。 參議院有一個臨時和更加狹窄的(比較過期的法律版本) PAYGO規則, 創造作為一致預算決議的特點。2008年它被提名到期。 議院沒有這樣供應, 但它增加了新的提出關於議程的問題供應到

    它的規則。

    參考資料: ...
    • Commenter avatar登入以對解答發表意見
還有問題?馬上發問,尋求解答。