~杜仔~ 發問時間: 社會與文化語言 · 1 0 年前

頭痛的翻譯阿 請大家幫忙一下 送20

Substance use disorders

gives the baseline values and the change in these values at the four assessment points (3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the beginning of the study) on the two outcomes of interest for the timeline follow-back: percent of days of abstinence for the most frequently used substance and percent of days of abstinence from all substances. shows that the integrated care group had a greater increase in percent of days of abstinence over baseline values than the routine care group at all assessment points during and after treatment, although the differences were not significant at any single time point. When the mean change in percent of days of abstinence relative to baseline values over the four time points during and after treatment were compared between the two groups (sum of the percent of days of abstinence at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months subtracted from the baseline value), the percent of days of abstinence from all substances was greater for the integrated care group (median=19.99, range=–25.6 to 83.4, versus median=–6.52, range=–67.9 to 53.2) (U=86.5, p<0.03). However, the difference between groups in the mean percent of days of abstinence relative to baseline for the most frequently used substance was not significant (integrated care group median=17.76, range=–25.6 to 83.4, versus routine care group median=–3.11, range=–46.2 to 54.6) (U=103.0, n.s.).

Leeds Dependence Questionnaire and Addiction Severity Index scores

For the integrated care group, the median baseline score on the Leeds Dependence Questionnaire was 4.5 (range=0–15); for the routine care group, it was 6.0 (range=0–13). The median baseline score of the integrated care group on the Addiction Severity Index was 0.37 (range=0.18–0.60); for the routine care group it was 0.34 (range=0.12–0.77). There were no significant differences in change scores between groups at the posttreatment assessments.

2 個解答

評分
  • 1 0 年前
    最佳解答

    物質使用混亂

    在重要二個結果上的四評估點 (3,6,9, 和在研究的開始後 12個月)提供基線價值和在這些價值方面的改變時間期限追從-背面: 數天的節制百分比為那最時常使用來自所有的物質的物質和數天的節制百分比。 整合的照料團體超過例行的照料有了了在基線價值上的數天節制的百分比的更棒增加的表演聚集在

    里茲依賴調查表和上癮嚴重索引得分

    對於整合的照料團體,在里茲依賴調查表上的中央的基線得分是 4.5(範圍= 0-15); 對於例行的照料團體,它是 6.0(範圍= 0-13). 在上癮嚴重索引上的整合照料團體的中央基線得分是 0.37(範圍= 0.18-0.60); 對於例行的照料聚集它是 0.34(範圍= 0.12-0.77)。 在 posttreatmen 在團體之間在改變得分中沒有重要的不同

    參考資料: 自己
  • 1 0 年前

    物質用途混亂

    給基值並且變化在這些價值上在四評估點(3 個, 6 個, 9 個, 和12 個月在研究的起點以後) 在二個結果利益為時間安排跟隨: 幾天的幾天的百分之節慾為最頻繁地被使用的物質和百分之節慾從所有物質表示, 聯合關心小組以百分比有更加巨大的增量幾天節慾在基值比定期關心小組在所有評估點在和在治療以後期間, 雖然區別不是重大的在些時間點。當卑鄙變動以百分比的幾天節慾相對基值在四次點在期間和在治療被比較了在二個小組之後(幾天的百分之的總和之間節慾在3 個, 6 個, 9 個, 和12 個月被減去從基值), 幾天的百分之節慾從所有物質是偉大的為聯合關心小組(median=19.99, range=-25.6 到83.4, 對median=-6.52, range=-67.9 到53.2) (U=86.5, p<0.03) 。但是, 區別在小組之間在幾天的卑鄙百分之節慾相對基礎線為最頻繁地被使用的物質不是重大的(聯合關心小組median=17.76, range=-25.6 到83.4, 對定期關心小組median=-3.11, range=-46.2 到54.6) (U=103.0, n.s.) 。

    利茲依賴性查詢表和癮嚴肅標註比分

    為聯合關心小組, 中間基礎線比分在利茲依賴性查詢表是4.5 (range=0-15); 為定期關心小組, 它是6.0 (range=0-13) 。聯合關心小組的中間基礎線比分在癮嚴肅索引是0.37 (range=0.18-0.60); 為定期關心小組它是0.34 (range=0.12-0.77) 。沒有在變動比分上的重大區別在小組之間在posttreatment 評估。

    參考資料: 英文
還有問題?馬上發問,尋求解答。