請問有留學過寫過報告的大大， Article critique是要我寫些什麼東西呢？
這個Assignment是 To critically evaluate the literature on an advertising management issue，但是我不太知道Article critique要怎麼下筆，內容大概要注意哪些要點呢？謝謝！^___^
- 1 0 年前最佳解答
From what I learn in NUS (National University of Singapore):
I think before writing a critique you must first understand the purpose of a critique. A critique is a scrutiny of a argument to determine how strong it is and whether we can accept the claims its writer makes. The focus, then , is on how successful the writer is at delivering his argument persuasively, rather than his subject as such. YOU SHOULD CRITIQUE THE ARGUMENT NOT THE SUBJECT.
In your critique of text you should prepare the following:
1. Consider the logic of the argument (Does it contain logical fallacies?, To what extend it sounds logical?)
2. Consider the substance of the argument (Does it contain any false assumptions?, Does it have limit/narrow views?)
3. Consider your own position (Do you are with the writer? Is your opinion coloured by personal prejuedice? What are your foundations for your objections to things in the text?
4. Back up what you say by research by secondary sources.
- 熊熊Lv 51 0 年前
The Book Review or Article Critique:General GuidelinesWhat is the specific topic of the book or article? What overall purpose does it seem to have? For what readership is it written? (The preface, acknowledgements, bibliography and index can be helpful in answering these questions. Don't overlook facts about the author's background and the circumstances of the book's creation and publication.) Does the author state an explicit thesis? Does he or she noticeably have an axe to grind? What are the theoretical assumptions? Are they discussed explicitly? (Again, look for statements in the preface, etc. and follow them up in the rest of the work.) What exactly does the work contribute to the overall topic of your course? What general problems and concepts in your discipline and course does it engage with? What kinds of material does the work present (e.g. primary documents or secondary material, literary analysis, personal observation, quantitative data, biographical or historical accounts)? How is this material used to demonstrate and argue the thesis? (As well as indicating the overall structure of the work, your review could quote or summarize specific passages to show the characteristics of the author's presentation, including writing style and tone.) Are there alternative ways of arguing from the same material? Does the author show awareness of them? In what respects does the author agree or disagree? What theoretical issues and topics for further discussion does the work raise? What are your own reactions and considered opinions regarding the work? Written by Dr. Margaret Procter, Coordinator, Writing Support, University of Toronto. Copyright 2006. All rights reserved.參考資料： Cited from Site created by Dr. Margaret Procter, Coordinator, Writing Support.
- ?Lv 51 0 年前
雖然我知道 Article critique 是什麼，但是我沒有出國留學過，所以無法回答你... 唉~~~ 抱歉囉... orz