小黑 發問時間: 社會與文化語言 · 1 0 年前

服務接觸論文翻譯 請幫我翻譯 謝謝

After consensus on the major groups, the process of delineating categories within the groups was initiated. Using an iterative process, two researchers road, sorted, reread and recombined the incidents until consensus was achieved on category labels and assignment of each incident to one of 12 resulting categories.

All incidents then were sorted by a third researcher who was given the categorization tasks. Interjudge agreement( based on the third researcher’s sorting of the incidents) on assignment of the incidents to the 12 categories was 88 and 92% for satisfactory and dissatisfactory incidents, respectively.

2 個解答

評分
  • 成程
    Lv 4
    1 0 年前
    最佳解答

    After consensus on the major groups, the process of delineating categories within the groups was initiated.

    在主要群組的分類有共識之後,接下來的就開始進行群組內類別的描述程序。

    Using an iterative process, two researchers road, sorted, reread and recombined the incidents until consensus was achieved on category labels and assignment of each incident to one of 12 resulting categories.

    使用重複的淬取過程,兩個研究者讀了又讀,排序又排序,重組合了一些事件,直到類別標籤達到共識,及每一事件被分派到12個類別上為止。

    All incidents then were sorted by a third researcher who was given the categorization tasks.

    第三個研究者再將所有事件排序,該員被授予類別分類的工作。

    Interjudge agreement( based on the third researcher’s sorting of the incidents) on assignment of the incidents to the 12 categories was 88 and 92% for satisfactory and dissatisfactory incidents, respectively

    事件分類的交叉比對(以第三位研究者的事件排序為準),在滿足及不滿足的事件上分別有88%及92%的相同分類。

    你有打錯一些字,是88%不是88

    參考資料: 自己
  • HA
    Lv 6
    1 0 年前

    在關於主要的組的共識之后,刻劃的在組內的種類的過程被起動。 使用一個反覆的過程, 兩條研究人員道路,分類,重讀,重新結合事件, 直到共識是被按完成的對12個導致的種類之一的每個事件的種類標籤和任務。

    被給歸類任務的第3 個研究人員然後分類了全部事件。 Interjudge 協議(基于 在對12個種類的事件的任務上,第3 researcher s 事件的分類)是88 和令人滿意和dissatisfactory 事件92%, 分別。

還有問題?馬上發問,尋求解答。