家偉 發問時間: 社會與文化語言 · 1 0 年前

有誰能幫我翻這篇文章.(急需)

很多事情總要客觀去看待才能明白對錯之分,但往往當事者無法以客觀的眼光看待對錯!

該如何做,才能每件事以客觀角度看待?其實真實世界沒有所謂絕對,只有相對。只是色階不同看人怎麼去區分。

對你而言非常正確的觀念,也許很多人認為那是錯的,但他人也不可用簡單的對錯來對你的觀念亂下評語,每個人有每個人的看法。想要客觀,要懂得交叉比對,從各方面的條件去觀察整件事情的環境、參與人物個性人際關係互動、時間背景,才能下判斷。

基本上,因為發言的人還是會因為自身經驗跟心態不同而加入自己的感受來敘述整個狀況,有意或無意的誤導了聆聽者,比方說:這個圖形你覺得是ac線比較長,別人卻認為是一樣長,這時能說對方錯了嗎?即使找一個公證人來問,一樣也是用公證人自己的了解來判斷啊!你怎麼知道對方沒有IQ?

所以凡事不能只看一面,應收集多方面證言來交叉比對才能找出較近似的真相,但這個真相依然是你用你的智慧跟經驗做出來的結論,技術上來說做不到完全的客觀。

因為,客觀需要很大的判斷思考,而去了解事實,才是真正的客觀。

2 個解答

評分
  • 最佳解答

    你是要翻英文嗎

    如果是的話請看下面

    英文

    A lot of things always want objective treat and can understand to wrong of cent, but usually the matter can't be treated with objective taste to wrong!

    How should do, can each matter be treated with objective angle?In fact the real world has no so-called absolute, only opposite.Just the color rank dissimilarity sees a person how to go to distinguish analyse.

    Very right idea to you, perhaps a lot of persons think that to is wrong, but the others can't use, either simple of descend a comment to your idea confusion towards being wrong coming, everyone has everyone's viewpoint.Want to be objective, know to cross ratio to, the in all its bearing condition observes the whole environment of thing and participates the person character social interaction interaction, time background, can descend judgment.

    Basically, because a person still a meeting of the speech because the self experience is different from mindset and join an own feeling to describe the whole condition, have intention to or not intentional of misled to listen, suppose:This sketch you feel is the ac line is longer, but the other people think to is similar to grow, can say the other party at this time wrong?Even find a notary public to ask, similar also is use notary public own understanding to judge!You how can anyone know does the other party have no IQ?

    So the all things can't only see one side, should collect various certificate speech to cross than is the conclusion that you use your intelligence to do out with experience still towards canning find out more similar true facts, but this true facts, the technique comes up to say that canning not do it is complete objective.

    Because, objective need a very great judgment thinking, and understand fact, just is real objective.

    因為不知道你要翻哪一種語言

    只好翻英文和日文〈因為有比較多的人要翻英日文〉如果多翻了日文應該沒關係吧

    日文

    2007-02-25 14:47:32 補充:

    不好意思

    日文我不翻了

    2007-02-25 14:48:24 補充:

    對不起

    有亂碼

  • 嘉豪
    Lv 6
    1 0 年前

    Very many matters must objective regard can understand to the wrong division, but the party concerned is often unable by objective judgment regarding to wrong!

    How should do, can each matter by objective angle regarding? Actually real world not so-called 絕 to, only then relative. Only is the color step looked differently how the human does differentiate.

    The extremely correct idea speaking of you, very are perhaps many the human to think that is wrong, but other people not available simple to so to your idea chaotic under evaluation, each person has each person's view. Wants objectively, must understand intersects compared to, observes the entire item matter from various aspects condition the environment, participates in the character individuality interpersonal relationship interaction, the time background, can under judge.

    Basically, because of speaks the human could different join own because of own experience with the point of view feeling to narrate the entire condition, misleading listening respectfully which the mean or had no intention, for instance: This graph you thought is the ac line quite is long, others thought actually is equally long, by now has been able to say opposite party wrong? Even if asks a notary public to ask, equally also is judges with the notary public understanding! How did you know opposite party does not have IQ?

    One side therefore everything cannot only look, should collect the various testimony to intersect compared to can discover the approximate truth, but this truth still is you uses your wisdom the conclusion which does with the experience, in the technology not to be able to achieve complete objective.

    Because, the objective need very big judgment pondered, but understands the fact, is true objective.

還有問題?馬上發問,尋求解答。