promotion image of download ymail app
Promoted
匿名使用者
匿名使用者 發問時間: 社會與文化語言 · 1 0 年前

英文老師幫幫忙~已經盡力的學生

英文老師請幫幫忙~我知道翻的很糟/但我真的已經盡力了~~~

We believe that a system in which the move and oppose parts do not in principle have access to follower's support will soon be in difficulty. 我們相信在家庭系統中,行動者和反對者原則上都很難得到跟隨者長久的支持.

In one of our research families the father was invariably an ally of mother, even when she was oppressive and brutalizing to their son . Their inflexible interaction al pattern pro-hibited the child from ever turning to his father for support when he was being tyrannized, Meanwhile his mother was never held accountable for her behavior.

在我們研究家庭的一個案例中,一個父親總是一無返顧的支持母親,即使在母親對他們兒子殘暴和虐待時。當孩子正在被施行欺壓、虐待時,父母一慣的堅持,是禁止小孩從母親這裡,求助他的父親。

,另一方面母親的行為責任也不會被質疑。

Such a pattern often continues be-cause the follower fears either that an oppose will gain an upper hand or that a mover will turn his anger on the follower for not following appropriately. Sometimes, there is an additional fear of shattering a tacit social contract between mover and follower.

經常如此的模式,追隨者也因為害怕不反對而獲得地位,或是追隨者適當的轉移行動者她的忿怒。有時, 要打碎一個心照不宣的社會默契,另外的恐懼掌控在行動者和追隨者之間。

In most instances, such contracts start to generate truly malevolent effects only when a third party gets caught up in their process. 在大多數實例裡,只有當第三者被捲入他們的過程時,這樣的合約開始產生真的惡毒的效應。

In at least four of the more disabled families studied in our research , tacit contract existed between husband and wife in which faithful following by the husband was based on a decision to protect the emotional fragility of his wife, a situation much like that described by xxx and his colleagues in their work on ‘marital skew’ the eventual disability occurring as a result in some of the children of these couples did not evolve out of in tention but rather out of a pattern of following that had become rigidly established because of an overriding concern for the health of the parental mate

在至少研究的四個????的家庭中, 默許這樣的合約存在於丈夫和妻子,丈夫是忠實的追隨者也基於維繫妻子間的感情,這情況很像那xxx描述和他的工作的同事在` 婚姻反稱性的工作'結果,在這些夫婦的小孩裡出現的最無能力,沒有發展,而建立的一個模式,優先的擔憂父母配偶的健康

已更新項目:

tilin63真的感謝你辛苦的解釋 ~_~

1 個解答

評分
  • 1 0 年前
    最佳解答

    版主番的其實差不多了,可能有一些字不熟,讓我解釋一下。

    Move是形容鼓勵,支持者, oppose是形容打壓者, follower是指跟隨者。在您的文章裡, 父親是鼓勵者,媽媽是打壓者,小孩是跟隨者。 這樣您可能比較了解。還有,第三跟第四篇裡所講的約定是針對不同人的,請注意。

    We believe that a system in which the move and oppose parts do not in principle have access to follower's support will soon be in difficulty。

    我們相信當一個系統裡的鼓勵者跟打壓者基本上都無法得到跟隨者的支持,這個系統將非常快的碰到困難。

    在我們研究家庭的一個案例中,一個父親總是一無返顧的支持母親,即使在母親對他們兒子殘暴和虐待。這種不變的互動模式會造成小孩不會在被欺壓時尋求父親的援助。同時,母親的行為也不會被別人質疑。

    這種模式會一直持續是因為追隨者害怕打壓者將會在鼓勵者獲得優勢,或是鼓勵者會不滿追隨者的不守規矩而忿怒。有時, 追隨者怕反抗會打破他跟鼓勵者之間心照不宣的約定。

    大部分的時候,這個約定會在第三者出現的時候產生不好的效應。

    在我們研究對象中,至少在四個的有缺陷的家庭中, 這樣的合約存在於丈夫和妻子。丈夫很忠實的遵守這個約定,以保護他妻子的脆弱感受。這情況很像那xxx和他的工作的同事在他們的研究` 婚姻反稱性'裡描述。這種夫婦關係模式下的小孩將不會基於自己的意向成長,而是發展一種緊緊的跟隨的模式。因為這些小孩會因對於擔心他們家長的身心健康跟感受為第一優先。

    對不起,上限超過了所以沒有把英文放進去。

    參考資料: 自己
    • Commenter avatar登入以對解答發表意見
還有問題?馬上發問,尋求解答。