It's Tucker vs. Chan, Round3
“Rush Hour 3,” the junky, clunky, grimly unfunny follow-up to the marginally better “Rush Hour 2” and the significantly finer “Rush Hour,” isn’t the worst movie of the summer. But it’s an enervating bummer nonetheless, largely because it shows so little respect for its two likable stars and its audience. Once again Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker, playing seriously unlikely detectives, bumble and slog through muddled setups, graceless action, crude jokes and even cruder stereotypes, sacrificing themselves on the altar of the director Brett Ratner’s vulgar success.
The arc of Mr. Ratner’s career can be summed up entirely with numbers, namely the $247,538,093 that “Rush Hour” raked into theaters worldwide; the $328,883,178 that “Rush Hour 2” made across the globe; and the mind-boggling (especially if you saw the movie) $453,796,824 earned, again worldwide, by “X-Men: The Last Stand.” These figures, from Variety, don’t include DVD revenue, cable sales and the like, but you get the big tautological picture: Mr. Ratner has a gift for making products that companies can sell to the public, which is why he makes products. Even so, given the anonymity of these products, the possessory credit “A Brett Ratner Film” seems largely ceremonial, even nostalgic, not to mention hubristic.
- 1 0 年前最佳解答
"高峰時間3," junky, clunky, 硬充滑稽的後續對少量地冷面改善"高峰時間2" 並且顯著更加美好的"高峰時間," 不是夏天的最壞的電影。但這是一衰弱的bummer 仍然, 主要因為它顯示那麼一點對它的二個可愛的星和它的觀眾的尊敬。再次Jackie Chan 和克里斯・Tucker, 扮演嚴重不太可能探員, 弄糟和苦幹通過混亂的設定, 粗俗的行動、粗暴笑話和更加粗暴的陳腔濫調, 犧牲在Brett Ratner 主任的粗俗成功的法壇。
Ratner 先生的事業弧可能整個地被總結以數字, 即$247,538,093 "高峰時間" 傾斜入劇院全世界; $328,883,178 "高峰時間2" 做橫跨地球; 並且令人驚訝(特別是如果您看了電影) $453,796,824 贏得了, 再全世界, 由"X 人: 最後立場。" 這些圖, 從品種, 不包括DVD 收支、纜繩銷售和等等, 但是您得到大tautological 圖片: Ratner 先生有一件禮物為做公司能賣對公眾, 是的產品為什麼他做產品。即使如此, 給這些產品匿名, 佔有的credit "Brett Ratner 影片" 似乎主要禮儀, 甚而懷鄉, 不提及hubristic 。
- 匿名使用者6 年前
無法連結, 請複製網址到瀏覽器 → yam8