本強 發問時間: 社會與文化語言 · 1 0 年前

請幫忙翻譯 醫學期刊

Results: The mean Brink scale score was 9 (SD=2) and did not vary widely in this large, but highly select, patient sample. We found a weak, but statistically strong, relationship between age and Brink score. Brink scores were not related to diary and pad test measures of incontinence severity.

Discussion and Conclusion: Overall, PFM strength was good in this sample of women with stress incontinence. Scores tended to be similar, and it is possible that the Brink scale does not reflect real clinical differences in PFM strength.

1 個解答

評分
  • Pirate
    Lv 5
    1 0 年前
    最佳解答

    結果

    在這大型並且精選過的病人抽樣中

    一般Brink評量分數為9

    並且差異 不大

    我們發現在年紀和Brink分數間,一微弱,但統計上卻具有重大意義的關係

    Brink分數和飲食,及失禁嚴重的測驗無關

    討論和結論

    大體上,在這群壓力失控的婦人中,PMF 強度很好

    分數大致相似,很有可能Brink測量表並不能反映PFM強度真正的臨床差異

還有問題?馬上發問,尋求解答。