圓圓 發問時間: 社會與文化語言 · 1 0 年前

這句英文的文法型式

In front were tables covered with fish and shrimp.

可以改寫成

tables covered with fish and shrimp were in front 嗎?

請和我講這句的文法型式是什麼好嗎

3 個解答

評分
  • Yehoo
    Lv 6
    1 0 年前
    最佳解答

    In front were tables covered with fish and shrimp.

    可以改寫成

    tables covered with fish and shrimp were in front 嗎?

    請和我講這句的文法型式是什麼好嗎

    可以的

    In front were tables covered with fish and shrimp.

    (1)

    先看橘色的部分covered with fish and shrimp

    這是形容詞片語, 修飾前面的 tables

    是形容詞子句 which / that were covered with fish and shrimp 簡化的結果

    (2)

    綠色部分tables是主詞 ( 更廣義地說, 主詞要包含後面的covered with fish and shrimp, 也就是tablescovered with fish and shrimp)

    (3)

    粉紅色部分were 是動詞

    (4)

    黃色部分 in front 是主詞補語

    所以, 這個句子其實是

    S(主詞) + Vi(不及物動詞) + SC(主詞補語)

    寫成 Tables covered with fish and shrimp were in front. 當然沒錯

    那麼, 為何又要寫為In front were tables covered with fish and shrimp.

    可能是

    (a) 修辭上需要

    (b) in front 寫前面可以強調這個補語

    (c) 還有就是

    Tables covered with fish and shrimp were in front

    從主詞 tables到動詞 were 隔著 covered with fish and shrimp有些距離

    (d) 其他....

    無論如何

    In front were tables covered with fish and shrimp.

    改為

    Tables covered with fish and shrimp were in front. 是可以的

    它是 S(主詞) + Vi(不及物動詞) + SC(主詞補語)

    (end)

    參考資料: I myself
  • mars
    Lv 5
    1 0 年前

    In front were tables covered with fish and shrimp.

    這句在 were 的前面加上 there 會比較正確

    它的原形應該是:

    In front there were tables.

    The tables were covered with fish and shrimp.

    如要改成 tables covered with fish and shrimp were in front 的句型

    最前面要加定冠詞 The

    參考資料: Me
  • Ben
    Lv 6
    1 0 年前

    In front是虛主詞 表示"在前面的是..." 真正的主詞是之後的tables (which are) covered with fish and shrimp 擺滿魚蝦的餐桌 were 是動詞

    參考資料: 自己
還有問題?馬上發問,尋求解答。