小莎 發問時間: 社會與文化語言 · 1 0 年前

英文高手幫我翻譯一下~謝謝!SOS

真的是救命呀。請英文高高手幫我忙。幫我用白話一點的翻譯~非常感謝!!

GUIDELINES FOR EFFECT TO CASE ANALYSIS

Be sure the cause fits the effect. Identify the immediate cause as well as the distant causes. For example, the immediate cause of a particular airplane crash might be a fuel-tank explosion, in turn caused by a short circuit in frayed wiring, by faulty design, or by poor quality control by the manufacturer. Discussing only the immediate cause often merely scratches the surface of the problem.

Make the links between effect and cause clear. To clarify his point, Daniel Goleman shows examples of "right" situations and "sane" persons. Research from Harvard provides convincing support. Goleman's reasoning follows:

nonstimulating places→monotony→hallucination

The distant cause is discussed first so that the immediate cause will make sense.

Distinguish clearly between possible, probable, and definite cause. Unless the cause is obvious, limit your assertions by using perhaps, probably, maybe, most likely, could, seems to , appears to, or similar qualifiers that prevent you from making an unsupportable claim.

2 個解答

評分
  • 1 0 年前
    最佳解答

    GUIDELINES FOR EFFECT TO CASE ANALYSIS(指南為作用對案例分析)

    Be sure the cause fits the effect. Identify the immediate cause as well as the distant causes. For example, the immediate cause of a particular airplane crash might be a fuel-tank explosion, in turn caused by a short circuit in frayed wiring, by faulty design, or by poor quality control by the manufacturer. Discussing only the immediate cause often merely scratches the surface of the problem.(請務必起因適合作用。以及遙遠的起因辨認直接原因。例如, 一次特殊飛機失事的直接原因也許是燃料坦克爆炸, 反過來由粗劣的質量管理造成由短路在磨損的接線裡, 由有毛病的設計, 或由製造商。談論唯一直接原因經常僅僅抓問題的表面)

    Make the links between effect and cause clear. To clarify his point, Daniel Goleman shows examples of "right" situations and "sane" persons. Research from Harvard provides convincing support. Goleman's reasoning follows:

    nonstimulating places→monotony→hallucination(

    做鏈接在作用之間和導致得清楚。澄清他的點, 丹尼爾・Goleman 顯示"正確的" 情況和"神志正常的" 人例子。研究從哈佛提供說服支持。Goleman 的推理隨後而來: nonstimulating 的places?monotony?hallucination)

    The distant cause is discussed first so that the immediate cause will make sense.(遙遠的起因首先被談論以便直接原因將有道理)

    Distinguish clearly between possible, probable, and definite cause. Unless the cause is obvious, limit your assertions by using perhaps, probably, maybe, most likely, could, seems to , appears to, or similar qualifiers that prevent you from making an unsupportable claim.(清楚地區別在可能, 可能, 和確定起因之間。除非起因是顯然的, 限制您的斷言由使用或許,

    大概, 可能, 很可能, 能, 似乎對, 出現對, 或防止您提出unsupportable 要求的相似的合格者)

    以上是答案(括號裡是答案)

  • 1 0 年前

    指南為作用對案例分析

    請務必起因適合作用。以及遙遠的起因辨認直接原因。例如, 一次特殊飛機失事的直接原因也許是燃料坦克爆炸, 反過來由粗劣的質量管理造成由短路在磨損的接線裡, 由有毛病的設計, 或由製造商。談論唯一直接原因經常僅僅抓問題的表面。

    做鏈接在作用之間和導致得清楚。澄清他的點, 丹尼爾・Goleman 顯示"正確的" 情況和"神志正常的" 人例子。研究從哈佛提供說服支持。Goleman 的推理隨後而來: nonstimulating 的places?monotony?hallucination

    遙遠的起因首先被談論以便直接原因將有道理。

    清楚地區別在可能, 可能, 和確定起因之間。除非起因是顯然的, 限制您的斷言由使用或許,

    大概, 可能, 很可能, 能, 似乎對, 出現對, 或防止您提出unsupportable 要求的相似的合格者。

    參考用不一定對

還有問題?馬上發問,尋求解答。