～痕～ 發問時間： 社會與文化語言 · 1 0 年前

# 請幫忙英文翻譯成中文!!謝 謝!!

Explain why we cannot necessarily conclude that you should throw more fastballs in the following scenario:you are a baseball pitcher who throws two different kinds of pitches:fastball and curve .your team statistician tells you that at the current rate at which you employ these pitch,batters hit.275 against your curve, only .200 against your fstball.should you alter your current mix of pitches?

answer: We cannot say that the pitcher should throw more fastballs without first knowing how a chane in the proportion of pitches throw would alter the effectiveness of both types of pitches. In particular,throwing more fastballs is likely to decrease the effectiveness not only of the additional fastballs thrown,but of all other fastballs as well.And if this loss exceeds the gain from switching from curves to fastballs,more fastballs should not be thrown.

………………………………

### 2 個解答

• T C H
Lv 6
1 0 年前
最佳解答

Explain why we cannot necessarily conclude that you should throw more fastballs in the following scenario: 請解釋在以下的情況下，為什麼，我們無法推斷出，你該投更多的快速直球:

you are a baseball pitcher who throws two different kinds of pitches:fastball and curve. 你是個投兩種球路:快速直球和曲球的，棒球投手。

your team statistician tells you that at the current rate at which you employ these pitch,batters hit.275 against your curve, only .200 against your fastball. 你的球隊統計學家(或翻為統計數字)告訴你，按照目前你投球方式，打擊者對你的曲球打擊率是: 兩成七五，對你的直球打擊率只有兩成。

should you alter your current mix of pitches? 你該改變你目前的配球方式(或形勢)嗎？

answer: We cannot say that the pitcher should throw more fastballs without first knowing how a chane (change?) in the proportion of pitches throw would alter the effectiveness of both types of pitches. 答案: 在我們知道，更改配球方式，是否會影響兩種球路的有效性前，我們無法斷論，投手該投更多直球。

In particular,throwing more fastballs is likely to decrease the effectiveness not only of the additional fastballs thrown, but of all other fastballs (pitches?) as well. 尤其是投更多直球，很可能不只是降低了其他直球的有效性，也降低了所有其他直球(球路?)的有效性。

And if this loss exceeds the gain from switching from curves to fastballs,more fastballs should not be thrown. 如果這有效性的降低，超過由曲求改投直球所得的利益，你就不該投更多直球。

參考資料： myself
• 登入以對解答發表意見
• 1 0 年前

Explain why we cannot necessarily conclude that you should throw more fastballs in the following scenario:

請解釋為何在下列情況下，我們不能斷定應當投多數的快速球：

you are a baseball pitcher who throws two different kinds of pitches:fastball and curve .

你是一個投兩種球路的棒球投手：快速球跟曲線球。

隊上的統計學家說以你目前的被打擊率是： 打者敲了你275投曲球，但直線球只被敲了200投。

your team statistician tells you that at the current rate at which you employ these pitch,batters hit.275 against your curve, only .200 against your fstball.

你應該改變你目前曲球與直球的投球組合嗎？

should you alter your current mix of pitches?

answer: We cannot say that the pitcher should throw more fastballs without first knowing how a chane in the proportion of pitches throw would alter the effectiveness of both types of pitches.

答案：

在沒有瞭解當改變兩種球的組合比率如何影響整體的投打效率的情況下，我們不能斷定投手應投更多直球。（只上述問題中的情況）

In particular,throwing more fastballs is likely to decrease the effectiveness not only of the additional fastballs thrown,but of all other fastballs as well.And if this loss exceeds the gain from switching from curves to fastballs,more fastballs should not be thrown.

尤其注意，投更多直球不止等於是有可能降低增加直球數目中的效率，更會降低直球總投數的效率。 所以如果在增加直球投數（相對減低曲球投數，因為總投數不變）時，失敗多餘成功的話，投更多直球是個失策。

這是個有關統計概念的問題。

我盡量用中文逐字翻，只是有時是觀念的理會問題，不只是要懂字面上的翻譯。 希望有幫到你囉～

（有問題你再做補充，我會盡量補充解釋）

參考資料： 在加州念商的我
• 登入以對解答發表意見