? 發問時間: 社會與文化語言 · 1 0 年前

期刊標題英翻中~翻順一點

In addition, isolates from organic chicken meat demonstrated a lower level of antimicrobial resistance than their Enterobacteriaceae counterparts isolated from turkey meat for doxycycline (P < 0.0001) and sulfisoxazole (P = 0.0442).

The resistance rates obtained for Enterobacteriaceae isolated from conventional chicken meat were significantly higher than those obtained from turkey meat for chloramphenicol (P = 0.0044), ciprofloxacin (P = 0.0199) and gentamicin (P = 0.0067), and significantly lower for cephalothin(P = 0.0063).

2 個解答

評分
  • 沁心
    Lv 4
    1 0 年前
    最佳解答

    除此之外,針對doxycycline((P < 0.0001)與sulfisoxazole(P = 0.0442)的抗藥性進行測試,從有機雞肉分離出的菌株之抗藥性,比從火雞肉分離出其他腸道細菌之類似菌種之抗藥性要更低。

    從傳統養殖雞肉分離出的腸道細菌對於chloramphenicol (P = 0.0044)、 ciprofloxacin (P = 0.0199) 及gentamicin (P = 0.0067)的抗藥性,比從火雞肉分離出的相同菌株之抗藥性明顯的更高,但若是針對cephalothin(P = 0.0063)的抗藥性,則是從火雞肉分離出的菌株之抗藥性比較高。

    2008-02-25 19:48:52 補充:

    第二段的抗藥性

    應該是抗藥率

    剛剛才發現有個rates

    參考資料: myself, myself
  • 蜂欣
    Lv 6
    1 0 年前

    In addition, isolates from organic chicken meat demonstrated a lower level of antimicrobial resistance than their Enterobacteriaceae counterparts isolated from turkey meat for doxycycline (P < 0.0001) and sulfisoxazole (P = 0.0442).

    The resistance rates obtained for Enterobacteriaceae isolated from conventional chicken meat were significantly higher than those obtained from turkey meat for chloramphenicol (P = 0.0044), ciprofloxacin (P = 0.0199) and gentamicin (P = 0.0067), and significantly lower for cephalothin(P = 0.0063).

    另外, 孤立從有機雞肉比他們的腸桿菌科相對物展示了抗菌抵抗底層與火雞肉被隔絕為強力黴素 (P

    抵抗率被獲得為腸桿菌科與常規雞肉被隔絕比那些顯著高級被獲得從火雞肉為氯胺苯醇(P = 0.0044), ciprofloxacin (P = 0.0199) 並且艮他黴素(P

    = 0.0067), 和極大降下為先鋒霉素I(P = 0.0063) 。

    參考資料:
還有問題?馬上發問,尋求解答。