玥暖璇 發問時間: 社會與文化語言 · 1 0 年前

誰可以幫我翻譯這段文章?

A salient feature of inward FDI in China is that the investing countries can be identified in two distinct groups: overseas Chinese (Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan, hereafter, HMT) and western countries (notably, the USA, European Union and Japan). It is argued that investors from these two sources possess different types of ownership advantages and business strategies, leading to heterogeneity in investment behaviour; for instance, in respect of the scale of investment, the extent of cooperative operation, productivity, and in the ability to transfer technology (Huang, 2004). MNEs from western countries stateof-the-art technology from heavy investment in R&D. This confers ownership advantages that enable them to compete successfully in technology-intensive industries with other firms in the t market (Buckley et al., 2002). This contrasts with HMT MNEs whose ownership advantages are thought to lie in skills of using standard technology and in experience of organizing labour-intensive production for re-export (Shi, 1998). We therefore expect that HMT firms are more competitive in labour rather than in technologyintensive industries.

已更新項目:

TO LEO:可以再幫我翻譯我發問中其他的翻譯問題嗎^^?謝謝~

2 個解答

評分
  • Leo
    Lv 7
    1 0 年前
    最佳解答

    A salient feature of inward FDI in China is that the investing countries can be identified in two distinct groups: overseas Chinese (Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan, hereafter, HMT) and western countries (notably, the USA, European Union and Japan). It is argued that investors from these two sources possess different types of ownership advantages and business strategies, leading to heterogeneity in investment behavior; for instance, in respect of the scale of investment, the extent of cooperative operation, productivity, and in the ability to transfer technology (Huang, 2004). MNEs from western countries state of-the-art technology from heavy investment in R&D. This confers ownership advantages that enable them to compete successfully in technology-intensive industries with other firms in the t market (Buckley et al., 2002). This contrast with HMT MNEs whose ownership advantages are thought to lie in skills of using standard technology and in experience of organizing labor-intensive production for re-export (Shi, 1998). We therefore expect that HMT firms are more competitive in labor rather than in technology intensified industries.

    在中國FDI內部一個明顯特點是投資的國家可以清楚的分成兩個族群:海外華僑(香港、澳門和臺灣,此後簡稱HMT)以及西方國家(比較顯見的有美國、歐洲共同體和日本)。比較具爭議的是,這兩個族群裡的投資者擁有不同類型的優勢和經營策略,導致投資行為不太一致;例如,有關投資的規模方面,合作方式的程度,生產力,和轉移技術的在能力方面(Huang, 2004)。MNEs藉由西方國家高精緻度的技術,以及大量投資在產品研究和發展(Research & Development)。這些擁有技術的優勢使得他們成功地在技術密集的產業與其它企業競爭(Buckley et al., 2002)。與MNEs相反的是, HMT擁有的優勢是在使用標準技術技能然後組織勞動密集生產的經驗做轉出口產品(Shi, 1998)。因此我們預期HMT的企業在勞力密集的行業比技術密集的產業具競爭力。

  • 小均
    Lv 5
    1 0 年前

    內部FDI 一個明顯特點在中國是, 投資的國家可能被辨認在二個分明小組: 海外華僑(香港、澳門和臺灣, 此後, HMT) 並且西方國家(著名地, 美國、歐共體和日本) 。它被爭論, 投資者從這兩個來源擁有不同的類型歸屬好處和經營戰略, 導致非均勻性在投資行為; 例如, 關於投資,

    程度標度合作操作, 生產力, 和在能力轉移技術(黃2004) 。MNEs 從西方國家stateof 這藝術技術從巨大投資在R&D 。這商談使他們成功地競爭在技術密集的產業與其它企業在t 市場的歸屬好處(Buckley 等2002 上) 。這與歸屬好處被認為在在使用標準技術技能和在組織勞動強度生產的經驗為再輸出的HMT MNEs 形成對比(Shi 1998) 。我們期待因此, HMT 企業是競爭的在勞方而不是在technologyintensive 產業。

還有問題?馬上發問,尋求解答。