? 發問時間: 社會與文化語言 · 1 0 年前

英文翻譯成中文 拒絕翻譯機

To be consistent in their utilitarianism,therefore,Frey believes that researchers should be willing to conduct their studies on marginal humans.

Researchers are unlikely to welcome Frey's finding.

For his part,Frey is untroubled,insisting that researchers cannot have it both ways,using utilitarian modesof thinking when they believe it justifies their practice of using other-than-human animals in their studies,only to discard utilitarianism when its implications for the selection of marginal humans as research subjects are made manifest.

2 個解答

評分
  • Leo
    Lv 7
    1 0 年前
    最佳解答

    To be consistent in their utilitarianism, therefore, Frey believes that researchers should be willing to conduct their studies on marginal humans.

    為了要與他們的功利主義一致,因此,Frey認為研究人員應該是願意將他們的研究在少量人類上進行研究。

    Researchers are unlikely to welcome Frey's finding.

    研究員對Frey的意見當然是不太可能接受的。

    For his part, Frey is untroubled, insisting that researchers cannot have it both ways, using utilitarian modes of thinking when they believe it justifies their practice of using other-than-human animals in their studies, only to discard utilitarianism when its implications for the selection of marginal humans as research subjects are made manifest.

    對這一部份,Frey是不會受到困擾的,他堅持研究人員不可能兩者兼顧,當他們相信在他們的研究裡使用非人類動物是合理的就使用功利主義模式, 只有當必需少量使用人類來做實驗品是必要的時候才放棄功利主義.

  • Thomas
    Lv 4
    1 0 年前

    已經射擊警察反對hiTo的被告在他們的功利主義裡一貫,因此,弗雷相信 那研究人員應該願意在邊緣的人身上進行他們的研究。

    研究人員不可能歡迎弗雷發現。

    就他而言, 弗雷未受煩擾, 堅持說研究人員不能腳踩兩只船, 當他們相信它證明他們的在他們的研究過程中使用除了人的動物的實踐是正確的時,使用實用的modesof認為, 只丟掉它暗示給邊緣的人的精品選集研究課題被做明白什麼時候的功利主義。 米

    參考資料: .
還有問題?馬上發問,尋求解答。