YouTube的移除規範為何?

跟雅虎知識+一樣,YouTube是靠網友的熱心貢獻才有可能維持。任何網路公司(不管是內容或入口網站)都應該知道「優質內容」是維繫網站成功與否的關鍵,「優質內容」是他們資料庫裡的寶藏,是他們與其他競爭者競爭的利器!!!

然而網路世界龍蛇夾處,來自網友熱心貢獻的品質可能參差不齊,請問維基百科的移除規範為何?

台灣的雅虎知識+如果狂刪優質回答,卻對電腦軟體翻譯之類的「最佳解答」視若無睹的話,久而久之這裡就不會有精彩的資料庫留給網友搜索!!!

請問,YouTube會像台灣的雅虎知識+一樣,以「標題過於籠統」等等愚蠢的理由刪除優質的網友回答,卻對類似翻譯軟體產生的「最佳解答」視若無睹,從而造成劣幣逐良幣的現象嗎?

已更新項目:

更正第二段:然而網路世界龍蛇夾處,來自網友熱心貢獻的品質可能參差不齊,請問YouTube的移除規範為何?

2 個已更新項目:

PS, YouTube 也像台灣的雅虎知識+一樣,白目地刪除網友提供的優質submission嗎?

2 個解答

評分
  • Elisa
    Lv 7
    1 0 年前
    最佳解答

    YouTube 也像台灣的雅虎知識+一樣,白目地刪除網友提供的優質submission嗎? I don’t believe so because like BBJ stated its intention is different and its target audience is different too. What I learn is that you can report spam on any content with inappropriate languages and contents at YouTube.

    I would like to point out another site – Answers.com, which is more reputable than Yahoo, and its ideas around managing wikianswers.

    Yahoo has much to learn from Answers.com on managing the site and getting rid of the current issues around encouraging the abusive behaviors to delete questions. See more details from http://wiki.answers.com/help/how_to_contribute

    Questions:

    If your question has already been asked and answered you'll see the answer immediately.

    There are popularity rankings on questions for voting on the importance of questions.

    Questions can be improved, too. This way they are more likely to help lots of people instead of just one person.

    Answers:

    This is not a popularity ranking on answers because answers can be improved and edited upon over time. What was once an unpopular answer could become more useful and vice-versa. If the answer is just badly-written, uninformed, or incomplete, anyone improve it. What I learn is that the answers or questions will not be removed unless they violate the law. If you don't agree with the answer — but you don't think it was intentionally written to mislead people — leave the opinion and add your own. Even better, try to combine them into one, complete, objective answer.

    WikiAnswers is a Q&A community where answers are grown collaboratively and that anyone from anywhere has the ability to edit and modify existing posts. There is no ownership of answers (unless the question is asking for opinions), so signing answers is discouraged.

    2008-06-24 10:35:31 補充:

    Most of the information displayed in the Answers.com window is copyrighted by our content source partners. However, if you are referring to an entry from Wikipedia -- the user-edited encyclopedia -- we invite you to edit this article yourself, directly at the source.

    2008-06-24 10:36:15 補充:

    Opinions:

    You can voice your opinion when you come across a user who you think did a great job answering or editing.

    ** I believe if Yahoo Knowledge manages like Answers.com, it will become a more reputable site.

    2008-06-24 23:21:34 補充:

    By the way, the way that I manage "English Forum" knowledge group would be similar to wikianswers or wikipedia, that it allows anyone to provide comments to the questions in discussion.

    2008-06-24 23:21:48 補充:

    Any comment is accepted; however, through discussion and analysis, people will be likely to be steered to what should be considered as a better usage or explanation.

    2008-06-24 23:55:58 補充:

    Another reason that I feel Answers.com does a great job is that they started with 180 trusted titles from the most prestigious reference publishers, to give you the most comprehensive page available on a subject.

    2008-06-24 23:56:40 補充:

    You'll also find original articles researched by Answers.com's in-house editorial team, community-contributed articles from Wikipedia, and user-generated questions & answers from Answers.com's industry-leading WikiAnswers™ (WikiAnswers.com).

    2008-06-24 23:57:45 補充:

    Because they compile and unify multiple sources for each topic onto a single page, you save time and get the information you need quickly.

    2008-06-24 23:57:58 補充:

    The fact that we have integrated Wikipedia with our more than 180 "traditional" content sources allows students to compare some of the material in Wikipedia with these content sources.

    2008-06-24 23:58:12 補充:

    If students access and use Wikipedia content with this background in mind - cross-checking facts when appropriate - they will certainly benefit from the diligence and the devotion of the Wikipedia community.

    2008-07-07 22:57:45 補充:

    To Enter:

    Can you tell me why you gave me a negative remark and stated that "您的發言不適合在知識+ 發表,Yahoo!奇摩予以強制移除,若情節嚴重將給予扣點或停權處分。日後請避免類似的發言,謝謝您的合作。請參考相關說明:~~~~~ -1920"? I don't understand why my answer is not suitable.

    參考資料: Myself and Answers.com, Myself and Answers.com, Myself and Answers.com, Myself and English Forum knowledge group., Myself and English Forum knowledge group.
  • KH.
    Lv 5
    1 0 年前

    我的答案太粗淺. 還是貼過來了.當作拋磚引玉好了.

    狗尾續貂, 再補一點以前聽過的理論加點分析. 希望吸引更多人來回答

    -----------------------------------------------------------------

    我想Youtube的價值在於影音分享, (正確,易搜尋與否,重覆不重覆, 不重要!!????)

    而Yahoo, 分享之外,知識+的價值在於正確且易搜尋 (知識庫的概念). 所以較嚴格是可預期的.

    加上youtube沒有積分制,所以很多問題在知識有在Youtube還沒有.

    有人說, 不管是多爛的網路電玩,你只要用的排行榜名次, 就會有一堆人去拼第一, 拼升級. Yahoo知識就有點像這樣.

    Yahoo知識的積分制就是造成這種現象的主因之一. 沒有好的管理的競爭,就有可能成為惡性競爭的溫床 (一個問題只會有一個最佳解答;而最佳解答數跟比率影響升級與否.這當然是一種競爭)

    當你獎勵 A(升級) 而預期得到 B(好的知識). 而非獎勵 B來預期得到B. 你就不能確定會發生什事了. 因為管理學上, 當你獎勵 A, 你就會的到 A. 所以一堆人無所不用其極要獲得最佳解答不惜自問自答搞分身搞團體. 問題在於管理制度不夠有效.

    If you want B, reward B, not A. And, if you do reward A, don’t be surprised that you get A and don’t get B.

    “On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B.”

    推薦這篇文章

    YouTune的氣氛輕鬆多了, 我猜亂檢舉的就少很多吧? 純分享,沒有利害衝突...唯一的reward就是網友的回應罷了.

    我不知道Yahoo知識有沒有黑名單. 但是我覺得主要問題是競爭造成的負面問題吧

    總而言之,個人淺見是"這是競爭造成的現象", Youtube要是搞一個等級制,不要多久就亂了.

    跟Yahoo不同的是,YouTube上傳者都已經有一份local的檔案.不怕被砍.也沒有人無聊到要惡意檢舉因為當事人都會有備份,傷害不大.

    如果能提供一個容易下載方便回答者備份的機制, 搞不好同理也能遏止亂檢舉的歪風? (或管理員亂砍?)

    參考資料: Academy of Management Journal: “On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B.”
還有問題?馬上發問,尋求解答。