蘑菇
Lv 4
蘑菇 發問時間: 社會與文化語言 · 1 0 年前

有關英文口試的稿子

題目

List at least three ways in which humans use animals. Should we use them in these ways? Why or why not?

這是我先想好的翻譯

人們使用到動物的方法,有利用警犬查獲走私毒品、盲人使用導盲犬、使用動物來作人類的食物或是動物實驗。在這些方法中,使用到的動物,有的可以,有的卻不行。

利用狗靈敏的嗅覺來幫助警察在海關查緝毒品,是可以的,利用訓練過的導盲犬幫目盲人,代替盲人的眼睛,也是可以的,因為這兩種方法都是專業的象徵。而使用動物來當做人們的食物,如果是吃生產量多的動物ex.chicken,pork,fish,beef.,就可以使用,如果是吃生產量少的動物ex:海豚,鯨魚,很可能使他們絕種,最後的動物實驗,由於很多的研究者,會使用白老鼠來做實驗,但是為了人類許多疾病的研究,我認為使用牠們的方法是可以被接受的。

humans use animals

we use them in these ways

大約需要兩分鐘的背搞。

翻譯的文法及單字簡單就好。

我不曉得我打的中文稿子~夠不夠多?!還是太少?!

麻煩幫我修改中文的數量,然後翻譯成英文!!

謝謝~麻煩了

2 個解答

評分
  • KH.
    Lv 5
    1 0 年前
    最佳解答

    Kevin 已經翻得這麼好, 我實在沒有再回文的理由

    不過既然你寫信問我,我就姑且試試.

    首先中文我看到一個問題. 可不可用的問題核心是什麼沒有重點. 只要不會造成絕種就行嗎? 還是專業的象徵就可以? 我覺得少了點重心. (不過只有幾分鐘.其實也不用太計較吧?)

    Animals are of great use to humans. For example, we use dogs to detect explosives, drugs, or contrabands, other animals such as chimpanzees, rats, or geene pigs for scientific or medical experiments and research. Also, majority of the food products such as beef, chicken, eggs, pork, and milk come from the animals and each of which has different applications depends on the features considered useful by human. (此段可用可不用, 因為跟後面有重疊)

    Animals flourish on this planet because, like humans, they need to survive and reproduce. As humans, we have taken advantage of nature, decided that humans are more important than animals, chosen to ingore the downfall when our wellfare clashes with that of animals, and consequently, caused many animal species to go extinct and harmed the balance of the ecosystem.

    So, the big question is "How do we justify the use of the animal?"

    In my opinion, the sustainability and the balance of the eco-system is the key.

    The use of the dog at the custom to detect drugs or to assist the blinds is justifiable, since it's the hallmark of the harness of nature endowments.

    Also, if managed carefully, the animals produced in mass amount such as cattle, pig, chicken, goat, etc, are a good source of food. However, if we put those endangered species on our menu, we risk putting them to extinct.

    The last but not the least, the use of animals for the experiments in the scientific or medical research in order to cure human diceases or yield new scientic insights is, too, justifiable. Despite the fact that we subjectively decide that they are expendable comparing to human lives, the contribution and the collective good is far beyond the damage it could cause in this application.

    2008-07-10 02:54:41 補充:

    typo: disease 才對

    2008-07-10 05:12:18 補充:

    putting them to extinct -> "driving/forcing" them to extinct 較好

  • Kevin
    Lv 7
    1 0 年前

    我想Sulky bbj的內容比較符何合版主的需求^^, 在下的就列為參考吧.

    Animals are of great use to humans, but definitely not vice versa.

    2008-07-10 10:07:10 補充:

    Some of the uses are justifiable, among which they serve as aiding tools such as police dogs for tracking down contraband and drugs and guide dogs for the blinds, or as food resources such as chicken, beef, and pork,

    2008-07-10 10:07:51 補充:

    because they are either for professional purposes utilizing animals' gifts, or raised solely to meet the need in the first place.

    However, I strongly urge that the preference of some people to consume those enlisted as endangered species be disencouraged before it's too late.

    2008-07-10 10:08:12 補充:

    As for animal experimentation, which is still debatable, I stand in favor of it, seeing these animals as, instead of being sacrificed, satisfying the same need for better health of humans as for food to survive.

    2008-07-10 10:09:00 補充:

    While taking advantage of animals for our own good, we humans surely are not to take it for granted.

    2008-07-10 10:10:20 補充:

    To preserve, or even to actively create, a good environment for animals, as well as other creatures including ourselves, is a mission of high priority for all of us to do as one of the residents in the Village Earth.

還有問題?馬上發問,尋求解答。