Renny L 發問時間: 社會與文化語言 · 1 0 年前

20點!!!文法訂正英文

謝謝!

1. In the article of “Is the proposal by a group of college presidents that the nation consider lowering the drinking age from 21 to 18 reasonable”, Eva Erskine, an adjunct faculty member of Roosevelt University in Chicago, says “no” on this issue because she thinks that there is no reasons or benefits to encourage youth starts drinking in the young age. I agree with Eva Erskine that we should not lower the drinking age because it occur many problems when a person starts drinking younger, such as binge drinking or alcoholic addictive. In fact, there are many people die from drunk driving every year.

2.Keeping the minimum drinking age of twenty-one years old is important and helps to save lives. Eva Erskine states that” I suggest to the college presidents in favor of lowering the drinking age that they research the number of teenage alcohol-related deaths” (11). The most supportive reason that opposite lowering the drink age is drinking will led too many negative impacts to our bodies, no matter is physical or emotional. Therefore, the best way for avoiding teenage alcohol-related problems is delaying the age of first drink.

3. Moreover, most teens lack of the mature and responsible on drinking. Teens can easily get agitated by the peer pressure. In fact, if we reduce the drinking age from 18 to 21 will increase many problems, such as alcohol addictive. It is because this action makes teens more available to get winery before they learn how to control themselves. For example, Teenagers probably will misunderstand about the correct way of alcohol usage. They may use drinking as an excuse to help them relief from the stress of reality; however, most teens tend to lost control and over rely on alcohol.

1 個解答

評分
  • 1 0 年前
    最佳解答

    1. In the article “Is the proposal by a group of college presidents that the nation consider lowering the drinking age from 21 to 18 reasonable”, Eva Erskine, an adjunct faculty member of Roosevelt University in Chicago, says “no” on this issue because she thinks that there are no reasons or benefits to encourage youth to start drinking at such young age. I agree with Eva Erskine that we should not lower the drinking age because many problems would occur when a person starts drinking at a younger age, such as binge drinking or becoming an alcoholic. In fact, many people died from drink driving every year.

    2. Keeping the minimum drinking age at twenty-one years old is important and helps saving lives. Eva Erskine states that” I suggest to the college presidents in favor of lowering the drinking age that they research the number of teenage alcohol-related deaths” (11). The most supportive reason that opposite lowering the drink age is drinking will lead too many negative impacts to our bodies, no matter physical or emotional. Therefore, the best way for avoiding teenage alcohol-related problems is delaying the age of first drink.

    3. Moreover, most teens lacks maturity and the sense of responsibility on drinking. Teenagers can easily get agitated by the peer pressure. In fact, reducing the minimum drinking age from 21 to18 will increase many problems, such as youths becoming alcohol addictive. It is because this action makes alcohol more available to teenagers before they learn to control themselves. For example, Teenagers probably will misjudge the suitable amount of alcohol usage. They may use drinking as a way to relief them from the stress of reality; however, most teenagers tend to lose control and over-rely on alcohols.

    參考資料: myself
還有問題?馬上發問,尋求解答。