Fay 發問時間: 社會與文化語言 · 1 0 年前

小篇英文翻譯 20點

By extending a sample selection method developed by Yeva Lindholm-Romantschuk and Julian Warner, this study examined 6,708 citations from both monographs and periodicals. The citations were first classified as references to primary or secondary materials. Citations to primary materials were tabulated according to publication format. For citations to secondary materials, the following aspects were identified and recorded: author, date, journal title (if applicable), publisher (if applicable), and publication format. The analysis showed that scholars in this field still generally fit the traditional profile of humanities scholars, using a large number of primary sources, drawing upon secondary sources from a broad age spectrum, and relying heavily on the monograph format for both primary and secondary materials. Electronic publishing is not generally considered a viable alternative to print publishing. Articles form an important aspect of literary research, but are not substitutes for monographs. Groups of core works and authors were not identifiable in this sample. However, significant core groups of journals and publishers do exist in this discourse community, and publishing is dominated by university presses. Because the sample was not randomized, the results of the study are not generalizable. However, the results map part of the territory of current scholarly communication in the humanities, provide information to illuminate further discussion of solutions to the publishing crisis in this field, and indicate areas for further research.

3 個解答

評分
  • 1 0 年前
    最佳解答

    By extending a sample selection method developed by Yeva Lindholm-Romantschuk and Julian Warner, this study examined 6,708 citations from both monographs and periodicals. The citations were first classified as references to primary or secondary materials. Citations to primary materials were tabulated according to publication format. For citations to secondary materials, the following aspects were identified and recorded: author, date, journal title (if applicable), publisher (if applicable), and publication format. The analysis showed that scholars in this field still generally fit the traditional profile of humanities scholars, using a large number of primary sources, drawing upon secondary sources from a broad age spectrum, and relying heavily on the monograph format for both primary and secondary materials. Electronic publishing is not generally considered a viable alternative to print publishing. Articles form an important aspect of literary research, but are not substitutes for monographs. Groups of core works and authors were not identifiable in this sample. However, significant core groups of journals and publishers do exist in this discourse community, and publishing is dominated by university presses. Because the sample was not randomized, the results of the study are not generalizable. However, the results map part of the territory of current scholarly communication in the humanities, provide information to illuminate further discussion of solutions to the publishing crisis in this field, and indicate areas for further research.

    通過擴大樣本選擇方法開發的Yeva林霍爾姆 - Romantschuk和朱利安華納,本研究從 6708引文專著和期刊。引文首次列為參考,小學或中學教材。引文初級材料列按出版物的格式。對於第二個引用的材料,在以下幾個方面確定和記錄:作者,日期,期刊名稱(如適用),出版商(如適用),和出版格式。分析表明,學者在這一領域仍普遍配置符合傳統人文學者,使用了大量的第一手資料,借鑒次要來源從廣泛的年齡譜,並高度依賴的專著格式小學和中學教材。電子出版一般不認為是可行的替代印刷出版。文章形成的一個重要方面文學的研究,但不是替代的專著。集團的核心工程和作家,無法識別,在此示例。然而,大量的核心群體和出版商的期刊中確實存在這種話語社區,和出版印刷為主的大學。由於不是隨機抽樣的研究結果並不普及應用。但是,結果地圖的一部分領土當前的學術交流,在人文,提供資料闡明進一步討論解決危機的出版在這一領域,並指出進一步研究的領域。

    建議使用yahoo或google翻譯ㄛ!☆'希望對你有幫助'☆

    參考資料: 自己+網路資源
  • 1 0 年前

    其實很簡單呀!!因為我有上過幾十年的英文,所以我才會!

    通過延伸樣品選擇方法由Yeva Lindholm-Romantschuk開始了,並且朱利安華納,這項研究審查了從專題論文和期刊的6,708引證。 引證首先分类為在主要或次要材料的參考。 對主要材料的引證根據出版物格式被製成表了。 對于對次要材料的引證,以下方面被辨認了並且被記錄了: 作者、日期、學報標題(可能唷),出版者(可能唷)和出版物格式。 分析表示使用很大數量的主源,這個領域的學者通常仍然符合人文学科學者傳統形象,得出在二次文献從一個寬廣的年齡光譜和沉重依靠主要和次要材料的專題論文格式。電子出版並通常沒有被以為對印刷出版的一個可行的选择。 文章形成文藝研究的一個重要方面,但是不是專題論文的替補。 小組核心工作和作者不是可識別的在這個樣品。 然而,重大核心词群學報和出版者存在於這個演講社區,並且出版由大學新聞控制。 由于樣品未被隨機化,研究的結果不可概括。 然而,結果映射一部分的當前博學通信疆土在人文学科的,提供信息阐明關於解答的进一步討論到在這個領域的出版的危機,並且表明进一步研究的區域。

  • 1 0 年前

    通過擴展開發的 Yeva Lindholm-Romantschuk 與朱利安 · 華納的樣本選擇方法,這項研究研究專著和期刊的 6,708 引用情況。 引文首先被歸類為主要或輔助材料提。 引文為主要材料,則根據發佈格式來。 輔助材料的引文以下幾方面是標識和記錄: 作者、 日期、 雜誌標題 (如果適用)、 發佈伺服器 (如果適用) 和發佈格式。 分析顯示在此欄位中的學者仍普遍適合傳統人文學者,使用了大量的原始資料,繪製輔助源後從一個廣泛的年齡譜和依靠的主要和輔助材料的專著格式的設定檔。 電子出版不是普遍認為可行的替代方案,以列印發佈。 文章構成一個重要的文學的研究,但不是替代專著。 不在此示例中識別的核心工程和作者的組。 但是,期刊和出版商的重要核心組確實存在此話語群落和出版由大學出版社主導。 該示例不隨機的因為有關研究的結果不是可歸納的。 但是,結果映射當前學術通信人文的領土的一部分、 提供資訊照亮進一步討論的解決方案,以在發佈的危機,在此欄位中,並表示進一步研究的地方。

還有問題?馬上發問,尋求解答。