xoxo 發問時間: 社會與文化語言 · 10 年前

急!請幫我翻譯成英文 拒翻譯軟體 15點

盡量用簡單一點的單字及文法 大約300字 謝謝

題目: 拒當灰姑娘-廢除學校宿舍的門禁吧

Intro

你所居住的學校宿舍有門禁嗎?

大家都知道學校宿舍一向設有累積三次晚歸就將喪失住宿資格的規定吧

今非昔比,有時學生 會晚歸難以避免,像是一些有經濟壓力,但下課後才有時間外出打工的同學,往往回宿舍時都已超過十二點,難道要因此剝奪她們工作的機會嗎

所以我強烈認為應該解除門禁以及晚點名

body

學校宿舍透過各種辦法,如:通知家長、記過處分..等的退宿壓力,嚇阻學生晚歸,表面上很像處處為學生著想但我認為這項政策並不是真的都適合每一位學生.

因為門禁限制剝奪了住宿學生參加課外活動的機會,使得住宿學生放棄參加許多有意義的活動,讓她們在大學生活中似乎必須失去些什麼。

但校方卻認為門禁措施,主要是考量學生安全及家長意見。一切的出發點都是基於保護.

但我認為例如:有學生為了趕門禁,不顧交通安全開快車,非常危險;晚歸的學生,也為了害怕被處分後遭到退宿,常常乾脆就不回宿舍,無法借住朋友家的學生,甚至只能深夜在外遊蕩, 如此一來「原本應該是要保護學生的門禁政策,卻造成學生更大的危險」

Conclusion

總而言之 廢除宿舍門禁這件事 學生天天都在抗議 學校天天都在處理

但真的有效嗎 至今還沒有一個結果

大多數的例子通常都是校方與學生各退一步 折衷辦法 廢除晚點名但門禁依舊

因為一旦廢除門禁學生出了問題,校方根本不想擔負責任

所以我認為最好的辦法就是如果你無法忍受門禁

那你還是不要住學校宿舍吧!

已更新項目:

Conclusion

總而言之 廢除宿舍門禁這件事 學生天天都在抗議 學校天天都在處理

但真的有效嗎 至今還沒有一個結果

大多數的例子通常都是校方與學生各退一步 折衷辦法 廢除晚點名但門禁依舊

因為一旦廢除門禁學生出了問題,校方根本不想擔負責任

所以我認為最好的辦法就是如果你無法忍受門禁

那你還是不要住學校宿舍吧!

4 個解答

評分
  • 10 年前
    最佳解答

    We are no Cinderella. Would our dormitories abolish the curfew?

    Does the university dormitory you stay in have a curfew?

    We all know that students of our school risk eviction from the dormitory if they fail to return before the specified time a night for three times.

    Students nowadays tend to return to dormitory later than before as some who are in the financial need to work after school can hardly return by midnight. A curfew means a deprivation of their rights to work.

    Therefore, I strongly believe that the system of curfew and demerit points for late returners should be abolished.

    The authorities of dormitories resort to various methods to deter students from returning late at night. That include notifying parents, adopting a demerit points system, and threats of eviction. All of these look like being done in the interest of students, but they turn out to hurt that of some. The curfew in effect prevents students who stay in a dormitory from participating in healthy campus activities and deprive them of something really important in campus life.

    The authorities insist that the curfew is in place for the sake of students’ safety and the demand from parents and it is entirely out of the intention to protect students from any form of harm.

    But we see cases where the curfew may cause harm on students. There are students who speed-drive on the road to meet the curfew. Some late returners who cannot find a safe place to spend the night might well choose to stay on the street. In these cases, the curfew has caused more harm to students than protecting them.

    2010-05-17 15:53:48 補充:

    Conclusion

    The matter of abolishing the curfew is a perennial subject of complaints by students and a headache for the university authorities. It looks like both of them are heading to nowhere.

    2010-05-17 15:54:17 補充:

    In most cases, the university and the students come up with some sort of comprise like abolishing the demerit points systems but maintaining the curfew.

    2010-05-17 15:57:01 補充:

    由於字數限制把餘下文字寫在這裡

    It is because the universities cannot afford the responsibility of any harm on students that could be attributed to the absence of curfew. As such, if you find this system unacceptable to you, choosing not to stay in a dormitory may be the only way out for you.

  • 匿名使用者
    10 年前

    我推薦您一個非常不錯的英語學習網站,里面有很多非常不錯的學習資源:

    http://www.hkenglishstudy.info

    希望可以幫到你!

  • 10 年前

    Title: resist when Cinderella - abolition of school dormitories, access it

    Intro

    You live in school dormitories have access it?

    We all know that schools have accumulated three quarters has been coming in late will lose their eligibility requirements to stay right

    Is not what it is sometimes hard to avoid coming in late students, such as some financial pressure, but only after the time out working class students, often have more than 12 o'clock when the dormitory, should be so deprived of their opportunity to work you

    Therefore, I strongly believe that access should be lifted and the roll call

    body

    School dormitory through various means, such as: notification of parents, demerit .. so check out the pressure, deter students late, and the surface, much like everywhere for the sake of the students but I think this policy is not really suitable for all students.

    Because of limited access denied boarding students the opportunity to participate in extracurricular activities, making residential students to give up participating in many meaningful activities, so that they appear to be in college life to lose something.

    But the school is that the access control measures, the main consideration is the safety of students and parents. The starting point of all are based on protection.

    But I think for example: a student to catch up access, regardless of traffic safety to drive fast and very dangerous; home late students, and also for fear of being punished after the check out, and often can not be bothered dormitory, students not staying in a friend's house even wandering outside at night only, this way "should be the access control policy to protect students, but students have a greater risk"

  • Intro

    you live the school dormitory has the entrance guard?

    Everybody knew that the school dormitory will always be equipped with accumulates late three times turns over to lose the lodging qualifications the stipulation today we are no longer as we have been, sometimes the student association late will turn over to avoid with difficulty, will be likely some have the economic pressures, but after finishing class, only will then have schoolmate who the time will go out to work, often will return to when the dormitory has surpassed 12 spots, can therefore eliminate the opportunity which they will work, therefore I thought intensely should relieve the entrance guard as well as the evening roll call

    Body

    school dormitory by each means that for example: Informs the guardian, to mark misconduct the punishment. And so on draws back sleeps the pressure, frightens the anti- student late to turn over to, on the surface looks like very much everywhere for the student considers, but I thought this policy is not really suits each student.

    Because the entrance guard limit eliminated the lodging student to participate in the extracurricular activity the opportunity, caused the lodging student to give up participating in many meaningful activities, let them as if probably lose anything in the university life.

    But the school authorities actually reveal the entrance guard measure, is mainly considers the student safety and the guardian opinion. All starting points are based on the protection.

    But I think for example: Has the student to catch up with the entrance guard, does not attend to the traffic safety drive fast, is dangerous; Late turns over to student, also after to be afraid punishes, is encountered draws back sleeps, simply does not return to the dormitory frequently, is unable to stay for temporary lodging the friend family the student, even can only late at night loaf in outside,

還有問題?馬上發問,尋求解答。