peace land 發問時間: 社會與文化語言 · 10 年前

請幫我英文翻中文~急! 謝謝了

Proponents of forfeiture say it is the only way for governments to stop rich criminals, such as drug lords.

If such suspects can keep their wealth, the argument says, they can afford to fight forever in court.

Even if they lose the court case, they look forward to being rich once they get out of prison.

Critics of forfeiture say that it involves unreasonable seizures and does not involve due process of law.

Furthermore, forfeiture rules can encourage money-hungry individuals and governments to prey on people like Mr. and Mrs. Dale.

Rewards up to 25% of the forfeiture value can be given to people or to local police departments who inform on suspected criminals.

期末考過不過就看這篇了~對我來說難度蠻高的~

已經翻到一個頭兩個大了~

拜託大家了

1 個解答

評分
  • 10 年前
    最佳解答

    沒收的支持者說這是政府的唯一阻止豐富經驗的罪犯途徑,如毒梟。

    如果這些嫌疑人可以保持自己的財富,道理說,他們有能力在法庭上永遠的鬥爭。

    即使他們失去了法院的情況下,他們期待著豐富而一旦走出監獄。

    批評者說,沒收涉及不合理的發作和不涉及法律的正當程序。

    此外,沒收規則可以鼓勵資金飢渴的個人和政府對人民的獵物如戴爾先生和夫人。

    獎勵高達 25%的沒收價值可以給予人或向當地警察部門舉發犯罪嫌疑人。

還有問題?馬上發問,尋求解答。