傳潔 發問時間: 社會與文化語言 · 10 年前

有英文翻譯達人可以幫我翻這大段嗎? 有點急 謝謝瞜

CONCLUSIONS

No changes of toxicological significance were induced

by FAVOR PAC when administered to rats at dietary

concentrations of 1 and 5% for up to 32 days. Any

differences observed between treated and control animals

were limited to increases in water consumption

and modifications in urinary ionic excretion observed

at the highest dose. Both findings were likely the result

of the relatively high concentration of sodium in the

test article, and thus consistent with adaptive physiologic

changes, not overt toxicity. Therefore, these findings

were deemed to be of no toxicological significance.

In conclusion, at levels of up to 5% in the diet, FAVOR

PAC did not produce treatment-related toxicity in rats

under the conditions of this short-term test; i.e., a

NOAEL of 5% FAVOR PAC in the diet was obtained.

2 個解答

評分
  • 10 年前
    最佳解答

    CONCLUSIONS (結論)

    No changes of toxicological significance were induced

    by FAVOR PAC(食用細粒-產品名) when administered to rats at dietary

    concentrations of 1 and 5% for up to 32 days.

    當白老鼠食用他們的產品FAVOR PAC連續32天之後,體內的含毒量看不出有變化, 食用濃度在於1%到5%之間

    Any differences observed between treated and control animals

    were limited to increases in water consumption

    and modifications in urinary ionic excretion observed

    at the highest dose.

    觀察其他不同類型的動物之後, 有食用與未食用的動物的差別在於, 食用高濃度過後的動物 喝水量比未食用多, 分泌尿液也較多.

    Both findings were likely the result of the relatively high concentration of sodium in the test article, and thus consistent with adaptive physiologic

    changes, not overt toxicity.

    兩項觀察的結果, 就是實驗體的含鹽量濃度極高, 所以是平衡生理變化, 並不是含有蓄意毒性

    Therefore, these findings were deemed to be of no toxicological significance.

    實驗的結論為, 食用產品後並無明顯毒性存在

    In conclusion, at levels of up to 5% in the diet, FAVOR PAC did not produce treatment-related toxicity in rats under the conditions of this short-term test; i.e., a NOAEL of 5% FAVOR PAC in the diet was obtained.

    最後結論, 5%的FAVOR PAC含量產品在老鼠的食物中, 短期間並不會產生毒性反應.

    參考資料: 自己翻的 大致上是這個意思 還有問題可以再發問 ^^
    • Commenter avatar登入以對解答發表意見
  • 10 年前

    CONCLUSIONSNo毒理學意義的變化:李兵inducedby管理委員會時,大鼠在dietaryconcentrations 1和5%至32天。Anydifferences觀察治療和控制animalswere之間僅限於水consumptionand增加尿中離子的修改排泄observedat最高劑量。兩個結果,是有可能的resultof相對高濃度的鈉thetest文章,從而符合自適應physiologicchanges,沒有明顯的毒性。因此,這些findingswere視為無毒性significance.In結論,在各級高達5%,在飲食上,FAVORPAC沒有產生治療相關的毒性ratsunder條件的這短暫的測試,也就是說,aNOAEL 5%的人贊成委員會在飲食中獲得。

    • Commenter avatar登入以對解答發表意見
還有問題?馬上發問,尋求解答。