英文講稿 請大師幫我修稿 謝謝
過檢定之後，續以因素分析中的主成份分析來萃取共同因素，依據特徵值大過1作為選取共同因素個數的原則，結果共選取三個主要因素，共可解釋全部變異之52.154%。經主成份分析與作最大變異轉軸法(varmax)，對選出的因素進行轉軸，使個因素之代表意義更明顯且更易於解釋 After KMO measureusing principal component analysis to extract common factors, based oneigenvalues greater than 1.0, the results of three main factors were selected, atotal of 52.154% Cumulative percent of varianceexplained.The principalcomponent analysis method with the shaft for maximum variation (varmax), rotate the factors to clarify the interpretation so that the meaning of factors are moreobvious and easier to explain. 特徵值大於 1 的因素共三個There are total three factor Eigenvalue greater than 1,因素一主要是由「價格」、「交通」、「生活機能」與「治安」等四個相關程度較高的變數所構成。由於，前三者的因素負荷量較高，但價格因素考慮的面項較多，故取「交通」和「生活機能」為命名對象，故將此因素命名為「生活機能與環境」Component 1 included the variables:"price" ; and "traffic" ; and "vital functions"; and "Public security" Since the first three Factor loading is higher, but theprice factor have various consideration , so we chose "Traffic" and"vital functions " as the name called " vital functions and the environment." 受訪者重視之購屋考慮因素，依序為: 「屋況」、「區段」與「生活機能與環境」Respondentsattach importance to the housing considerations, were: "The State Of House ", "sector" vital functions and the environment.經逐一以獨立樣本T檢定，依是否有房地產分組對其重視程度進行檢定，發現有「屋況」對「是否有房地產」有顯著差異(α<0.05)。「屋況」，有房地產者明顯較有無房地產者重視此一因素。這可能是沒有房地產者對其房屋狀況還不甚了解所導致的。By using independent sample T test to interpret whetherhave estate to considerations of young group forhouse. We found that “the stat of house” have significant difference (α < 0.05) to “whether have estate” people who have house were significantly higher pay more attention to those whodon’t have house. This probability mean the people who don’t have estate is unrealized the “state of house” 麻煩英文高手幫我檢查文法的錯誤,句子的通順度,用字遣詞好不好 ^^謝謝喔
- H. M. CLv 79 年前最佳解答
You need someone with knowledge of the 'real estate lingo' .. Good thing I am familiar with it and bought a house not too long ago .. and I understand technical writings ..
After KMO measurement using principal component analysis to extract common factors, based on eigenvalues greater than 1.0, the results of three main factors were selected, representing a total of 52.154% Cumulative percent of variance.The principal component analysis method was used with maximum variation (varmax) as axis, rotating the factors to clarify the interpretation so that the meaning of factors are more obvious and easier to explain.
There are total of three factor Eigenvalue greater than 1. Component 1 included the variables "price", "traffic conditions", "vital functions"; and "public security". Since the wieght of the first three factor is higher, yet the price factor has various considerations , so we combined "Traffic" and "vital functions" into "vital functions and the environment."Respondents attach the following importance to the housing considerations, "The condition Of House ", "neighborhood", "vital functions and the environment".By using independent sample T tests to examine the young buyers as to whether they currently own real estate, and how much importance they attach to it, we have found that “the condition of house” makes a significant difference (α < 0.05) to those who currently own real-estate. They pay more attention to the condition of the house than those who currently do not own one. This probability indicate that those who do not own real-estate are not familiar with the importance of the condition of the house.
2010-11-24 21:52:49 補充：
The hypertext tools are very screwy .. don't work very well .. resulting in the below corrections
There are total of three factor Eigenvalue greater than 1
There are a total of three factors, Eigenvalue greater than 1
- serenadeLv 79 年前