Yahoo奇摩知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東部時間) 終止服務。自 2021 年 4 月 20 日 (美國東部時間) 起,Yahoo奇摩知識+ 網站將會轉為唯讀模式。其他 Yahoo奇摩產品與服務或您的 Yahoo奇摩帳號都不會受影響。如需關於 Yahoo奇摩知識+ 停止服務以及下載您個人資料的資訊,請參閱說明網頁。

阿晚 發問時間: 健康其他:保健 · 1 0 年前

幫幫忙 請幫我翻譯...關於醫學 護理之類的

Kaplan-meier curves for freedom from colonization according to catheter location site. The risk of colonization was significantly lower for catheters inserted in the radial artery(dotted line) than those inserted in the femoral artery (straight line)(P=0.003 by the log-rank test)

Catheter-related bloodstream infections

In seven cases (2.4%,incidence density of 3.0 per 1,000 catheter-days),,bloodstream infections was attributed to a study catheter. These catheters had been in place for a mean of 10+- 3 days, Five cases of catheter-related bloodstream infectiom occurred among catheters inserted in the radial artery (2.1%,incidence density of 2.6 per 1.000 catheter-days), as compared with two cases among catheters inserted in the femoral artery (3.3%,incidence density of 4.2 per 1,000 catheter-days, p=0.46). Sepsis resolved spontaneously without antibiotic therapy after the catheter was removed in 1 case. In remaining episodes, patients required antibiotic therapy and two cases, vascular surgery for cureof pseudo-aneurysm. Two patients died but the medical staff did not consider any death to be unequivocally linked to catheter-related sep-sis. Microorganisms implicated in the cases of bloodstream infection associated with arterial catheters were mainly gram positive cocci (Table 2).

Discussion

The incidence density of catheter colonization and catheter-related bacteremia depends upon the character-istics of the population studied, the technique used for catheter-tip culture (quantitative vs. roll-plate culture technique) and the criteria used for the diagnosis of col-onization and bloodstream infection.

各位大大 小妹之前用Google 翻譯過 真的翻譯完 非常不順~

緊急需要 ^^~

已更新項目:

謝謝你唷 這算是一篇文獻 我只是翻譯裡面的其中幾部分,所以你可能會覺得看成兩部分 因為上半段 還有許多內容 ~

1 個解答

評分
  • 1 0 年前
    最佳解答

    Kaplan-Meier 將經導管感染微生物的導管位置做成曲線圖

    發現由橈動脈置入的導管其感染率顯著低於由股動脈置入的導管(P=0.03 經排列測試)

    7例經導管的血行性感染(2.4%,發生密度3.0/1000天),其血行性感染被咎因於研究性導管的置放.這些導管置放天數平均為10+-3天,其中有5例導管相關之血行性感染為置放於橈動脈之導管(2.1%,發生密度為2.6/1000天),相對的有2例為由股動脈置入之導管(3.3%,發生密度為 4.2/1,000天, p=0.46).有1例之敗血症於導管移除後自行痊癒,其他的皆需使用抗生素治療,且其中有2例因為假性動脈瘤需施以血管手術.有2例死亡,但醫療團隊認為這2例的死亡與導管感染之敗血症並無明確的關聯性.

    這些經由動脈導管置入而感染的微生物大部分皆是格蘭氏陽性球菌(表2)

    討論

    導管感染及導管置入相關之菌血症發生密度(機率)結果取決於採樣族群是否為特殊族群,導管前端之細菌培養的技術(數量 VS roll-plate培養技術) 及診斷為細菌增生併血行性感染之標準

    以上小弟勉強的亂翻了一下,請不吝賜教,但是怎麼最前面的一小段與後面的結果相反= =??

    莫非這是兩篇論文的討論??

    2010-11-29 03:44:47 補充:

    ^^希望這樣子的翻譯能給您小小的幫助....畢竟小弟英文不好= =

    參考資料: 我, 我
還有問題?馬上發問,尋求解答。