請問 DQC160 和 ADQC27 選哪一個比較好？看得一頭霧水，請給一些建議，感恩。
Vikuiti DQC160 Screen Protector for Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1
The spectacular Vikuiti™ DQC160 display protection film by 3M offers a newly developed film material, combining all the positive properties of present display protection films. With its hard coating the Vikuiti™ DQC160 display protection film provides superior mechanical protection. The surface is smooth and shines just the same as glass, making the film virtually invisible when applied. The film surface is composed of a very strong non-stick coating, allowing for even ballpoint pen and overhead marker ink dry erasable. The Vikuiti™ DQC160 display protection film is particularly easy to apply, since the adhesive layer is not sticky. This film virtually self-tightens to the display during application and can be removed or repositioned without a problem. Since the film is anti-static, no dust is attracted during the application. The film can be removed at any time and can be rinsed with clear water. Transparency: crystal clear
Anti-static film material
Extremely scratch resistant surface
Precise fit and contour
Guaranteed edge adhesion
Extremely easy, bubble-free application
Vikuiti ADQC27 Screen Protector for Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1
The Vikuiti™ ADQC27 display protection foil is crystal-clear, shiny and anti-reflective. Thus considerably reducing the intensity of reflections on your display in comparison to common foils!We developed this sensational display protection foil in collaboration with 3M, so that your display remains rich in contrast while outdoors or in bright areas. Through the anti-reflective coating, black is portrayed blacker.The Vikuiti™ ADQC27 display protection foils have an extremely scratch-resistant surface (scratch resistance is above a 4H pencil hardness) and are as smooth and shiny as glass is. While bringing on the display protection foil you can re-position it and also pull it off again at any given time.
- 9 年前最佳解答
2) 不容易沾染 被筆畫到輕輕擦就會掉
1) 也是標榜銀幕清晰透明 不過DQC160標榜像玻璃一樣ADQC27標榜像水晶一樣這...你就自己選
4) 也是來去不留痕跡跟DQC160 的第四點一樣
2010-12-31 08:07:26 補充：
選我喇:))參考資料： , 美國半個歲月的我
- H. M. CLv 79 年前
1. Are we to understand that these screen protectors are supposed to be used permanently ? Most of the protectors are suppoed to be removed after installed at home. ADQC27 sounds like it is supposed to be permanent. This needs clarification.
2. You did not give us the difference in price.
3. You gave us much less explanations about ADQC27, such as anti-static properties.
At this moment, with all the above questions, my vote is for ADQC27.