匿名使用者
匿名使用者 發問時間: 社會與文化語言 · 9 年前

請問螢幕保護膜要選怎一個比較好?英文文章,給建議拿15點。

請問 DQC160 和 ADQC27 選哪一個比較好?看得一頭霧水,請給一些建議,感恩。

Vikuiti DQC160 Screen Protector for Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1

The spectacular Vikuiti™ DQC160 display protection film by 3M offers a newly developed film material, combining all the positive properties of present display protection films. With its hard coating the Vikuiti™ DQC160 display protection film provides superior mechanical protection. The surface is smooth and shines just the same as glass, making the film virtually invisible when applied. The film surface is composed of a very strong non-stick coating, allowing for even ballpoint pen and overhead marker ink dry erasable. The Vikuiti™ DQC160 display protection film is particularly easy to apply, since the adhesive layer is not sticky. This film virtually self-tightens to the display during application and can be removed or repositioned without a problem. Since the film is anti-static, no dust is attracted during the application. The film can be removed at any time and can be rinsed with clear water. Transparency: crystal clear

Anti-static film material

Extremely scratch resistant surface

Precise fit and contour

Guaranteed edge adhesion

Extremely easy, bubble-free application

Completely removable

Vikuiti ADQC27 Screen Protector for Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1

The Vikuiti™ ADQC27 display protection foil is crystal-clear, shiny and anti-reflective. Thus considerably reducing the intensity of reflections on your display in comparison to common foils!We developed this sensational display protection foil in collaboration with 3M, so that your display remains rich in contrast while outdoors or in bright areas. Through the anti-reflective coating, black is portrayed blacker.The Vikuiti™ ADQC27 display protection foils have an extremely scratch-resistant surface (scratch resistance is above a 4H pencil hardness) and are as smooth and shiny as glass is. While bringing on the display protection foil you can re-position it and also pull it off again at any given time.

2 個解答

評分
  • 9 年前
    最佳解答

    幫你整理了意下他們個別的優勢

    DQC160

    1) 貼上去之後銀幕清晰透明螢幕會跟玻璃做的一樣

    2) 不容易沾染 被筆畫到輕輕擦就會掉

    3) 防靜電所以不沾染灰塵

    4) 撕掉也不留痕跡

    ADQC27

    1) 也是標榜銀幕清晰透明 不過DQC160標榜像玻璃一樣ADQC27標榜像水晶一樣這...你就自己選

    2) 不會有反射光

    3) 不容易被刮傷

    4) 也是來去不留痕跡跟DQC160 的第四點一樣

    其實是差不多的東西 如果是我會選第二個吧

    2010-12-31 08:07:26 補充:

    選我喇:))

    參考資料: , 美國半個歲月的我
    • 登入以對解答發表意見
  • 9 年前

    1. Are we to understand that these screen protectors are supposed to be used permanently ? Most of the protectors are suppoed to be removed after installed at home. ADQC27 sounds like it is supposed to be permanent. This needs clarification.

    2. You did not give us the difference in price.

    3. You gave us much less explanations about ADQC27, such as anti-static properties.

    At this moment, with all the above questions, my vote is for ADQC27.

    • 登入以對解答發表意見
還有問題?馬上發問,尋求解答。