Refusing help the haves-not also prevents upward social mobility from being carried out, the fact that the gap between the haves and haves-not is widening, because the different ground they stand on could cause extremely results. Take my friends as an example, both of my friends study at normal university. The rich one received a new scooter from her parents as her entering college gift. She began tutor as her first part time job by her scooter, and earned four hundred dollars per hour, she worked 8 hours and got 3,200 N.T dollars a week. Then, she used one third of it to invest gold, and gained 20% after two years. The other had to pay her tuition and living expense. She stared her first job as a waitress in an eatery, she work 25 hours and earned 2,250 N.T dollars per week. She was merely got ends and meets when she came to second year. Additionally, create a happiness society benefits all the people. It's only few minds of selfless for the rich could improve the situation of the poor, and the rich don’t need to worry about the crime that cause by the poverty. It’s a win-win situation.
- 9 年前最佳解答
Refused to help the poor not only paralyzesocial mobility from growing, it also widened the gap between the rich and thepoor. For example, both of my friends study at an university, which is notfamous. The wealthier friend received a new scooter from her parents as a giftof getting into a college. As a convenience, she had her first job, a tutorwith her new scooter as her transportation. Gradually, she earned four hundreddollars per hour, and got 3200 N.T within a week when she worked 8 hours a day.After, she invested gold with one third of her salary and retained 20% ofprofit after two years. In contrast, my poorer friend had to pay her tuitionfee and personal expanse with her own salary. She started her job as a waitressin an eatery, working whole day long but was paid only 2250 N.T per week.Consequently, she almost couldn’t support herself at the second year.On the other hand, creating a happy societybenefits every single person. If rich people had less selfish desire, then theywould begin helping the poor, which in turn would help the poverty. Inaddition, if poor people became wealthier, they would stop committing crime,which reduces the fear of being robbed for wealthy people. All of the changesare mutual benefits for both wealthy and poor people.