匿名使用者
匿名使用者 發問時間: 社會與文化語言 · 10 年前

(急)幫英文翻譯ˇ ˇ廢除死刑論點

可以麻煩幫我翻譯這些論點嗎 英文字數能幫我補充盡量幫我增加字數qq謝謝

1.死刑廢除了還有什麼能赫阻罪犯犯罪!!?死刑代表了什麼意義? 死刑代表的不單單只是一指逞法,也代表著赫阻極大犯罪的最後一道牆,因為有了死刑 犯罪者再犯罪的時候有了赫阻 進而有機會防止或避免犯罪的產生.2.在台灣大多數的人都反對廢除死刑,當廢除死刑還未成為國家全體國民的社會共識時,貿然跟著國際腳步走這不符合民主國家之程序,且漠視國家公民之人權。 3. 死刑的判定可以非常謹慎:例如僅有罪證確鑿的殺人行為並不會被判死刑,還要符合行為凶殘等條件,且有多層程序可平反。規定只要有冤獄可能就不得判死刑是應該的,但當達成此條件時,以微乎極微的冤獄可能性否定死刑並不合理。

1 個解答

評分
  • 10 年前
    最佳解答

    1.死刑廢除了還有什麼能赫阻罪犯犯罪!!?

    What can serve as deterrence for criminal committing a crime when abolishing death penalty!?

    死刑代表了什麼意義? 死刑代表的不單單只是一指逞法,也代表著赫阻極大犯罪的最後一道牆,因為有了死刑 犯罪者再犯罪的時候有了赫阻 進而有機會防止或避免犯罪的產生.What does death penalty representing? death penalty is not just a law enforcement, it also serve as last barrier of deterrence for crimes, because of the death penalty, deterrence works when criminal try to re-offending, therefore gives an opportunity to prevent crime from happening.

    2.在台灣大多數的人都反對廢除死刑,當廢除死刑還未成為國家全體國民的社會共識時,貿然跟著國際腳步走這不符合民主國家之程序,且漠視國家公民之人權。Most of people against abolishing death penalty in Taiwan, but when anti abolishing death penalty yet to to national's social awareness, insist to go along with the pace of internationals does not meet the procedure of a democratic country, and ignore national citizen rights.

    3. 死刑的判定可以非常謹慎:例如僅有罪證確鑿的殺人行為並不會被判死刑,還要符合行為凶殘等條件,且有多層程序可平反。規定只要有冤獄可能就不得判死刑是應該的,但當達成此條件時,以微乎極微的冤獄可能性否定死刑並不合理。Death penalty can be approach very cautiously: such as murdering with solid evidence and not be sentence to death penalty, it must meet the terms with brutally murdering and such, also there is a lot procedures can even it out. The rule must indicate any possible chance of miscarriage of justice should not have sentence to death penalty is reasonable, when the term is made, the chance of miscarriage of justice is considered to be less then possible, therefore using such excuse to abolish death penalty is no longer reasonable.

    參考資料: Awesome
還有問題?馬上發問,尋求解答。