- 老翻哥Lv 69 年前最佳解答
Some people advocate the human rights for criminals that sentenced to death. Then, who will come to rescue and revive the trampled human rights of innocent victims of crime?
In addition, governments that refuse to abolish death penalty are able to utilize it more or less as a deterrent to discourage crime.
Food and resources provided to capital prisoners substantially impose heavy burden on national finance and budgeting.
- Chang-BoeLv 69 年前
They are advocating for condemned human rights, but who is going to compensate for those innocent victims’ human rights?
Besides, for a government does not abolish the capital punishment, it can be more or less served as deterrence against those would be offenders.
The financial burden of a country is increased substantially to satisfy the need of food, resources, and other supplies by the condemned.
- 阿輔Lv 49 年前
你好! Q1Theyvoice for the condemned human rights but who should reimburse those innocentvictims’ human rights? 他們為死刑犯的人權發聲,但是那些無辜受害者的人權又該由誰來賠償呢?Q2Moreover, it can more or less frightenthose who are about to commit as long as the government doesn’t cancel capitalsentence.
Q3The food and resources condemned criminalsneed would increase our national expenditure greatly.
2011-05-23 19:30:07 補充：
criminalsneed=criminals need參考資料： teacher