阿興 發問時間: 教育與參考考試 · 8 年前

[991]多益英文[對話]和[克漏字]問題

在做歷屆多益題目有遇到問題,希望高手們幫我解答

我有特別提出我的疑問,希望能幫我多加講解一下...感謝

991

39.A:Cockroach are annoying. B:_______.

[A]I don't have the heart to kill them[B]I can't sleep well[C]They are my favorite[D]Playing with them is fun.

疑惑_A說蟑螂很讓我煩惱。但a和b的選項好像都可以,要怎麼正確的選擇哪一個?。

40.A:Do you understand what I said? B:NO,______

[A]You lost me[B]You won my heart[C]You got my point[D]You made me jump

這題的選項都讓我很不確定,語意上都很不確定..?幫我解說一a和b

cloze

After Abraham Lincoln became a lawyer,there were many stories about (1._____) his intelligence (2.____) him to (3.______) important cases. Once he was (4._____) a man (5.______) Duff Armstrong who was accused of murder.The (6._____) attorney's witness said that he seen Armstrong's face clearly (7._____) the moonlight (8.______)the light of the murder . Linocln brought an almanac and (9.______) in court that there was not enough moonlight that night for the witness (10._____) Armstrong.

1.[A]why[B]what[C]how[D]which….請幫我解說

2.[A]help[B]helping[C]helped[D]to help….請幫我解說

3.[A]win[B]beat[C]get[D]fight

4.[A]protect[B]defend[C]accusing[D]changing….請幫我解說

5.[A]by name[B]named[C]naming[D]in the name of….請幫我解說

6.[A]prosecuting[B]prosecute[C]prosecuted[D]prosecution….請幫我解說

7[A]under[B]below[C]beneath[D]in

8.[A]at[B]in[C]on[D]while

9.[A]proved[B]reproach[C]approved[D]approached

10[A]have indentified[B]having indentified[C]had indentified[D]to have indentified….請幫我解說

這題還蠻難的,我有點看不懂內文

The (6._____) attorney's witness said that he seen Armstrong's face clearly (7._____) the moonlight (8.______)the light of the murder .

這段好長,一直看不懂什麼意思!

什麼律師的見證人看到Armstrong的臉很清楚在月光底下,被謀殺?

Linocln brought an almanac and (9.______) in court that there was not enough moonlight that night for the witness (10._____) Armstrong.

下一段怎麼提到Linocln帶年鑑去法庭做什麼?然後月光充不充足跟目擊有什麼關係?

3 個解答

評分
  • 8 年前
    最佳解答

    1.A說的是蟑螂讓人討厭annoying是形容詞討人厭很煩人之意2. don’t have the heart=> don't have the strength or courage =>片語:沒有勇氣或力量3.若選I can't sleep well不能跟Cockroach are annoying.有任何關聯4.若選They are my favorite=>它們是我的最愛=>前後矛盾5.若選Playing with them is fun. =>和它們玩很有趣=>前後矛盾故A為正解40.A:Do you understand what I said? B:NO,______[A]You lost me[B]You won my heart[C]You got my point[D]You made me jump1. A:Do you understand what I said?=>你明白我說甚麼吧?[A] NO, You lost me不,你失去我(x)答非所問[B] NO, You won my heart不,你得我心(x) 答非所問[C] NO, You got my point不,你懂我的意思(x) 答非所問[D] NO, You made me jump不,你讓我大吃一驚=NO, You schocked me!(o)故[D]為正解 clozeAfter Abraham Lincoln became a lawyer,there were many stories about (1._____) his intelligence (2.____) him to (3.______) important cases. Once he was (4._____) a man (5.______) Duff Armstrong who was accused of murder.The (6._____) attorney's witness said that he seen Armstrong's face clearly (7._____) the moonlight (8.______)the night of the murder . Linocln brought an almanac and (9.______) in court that there was not enough moonlight that night for the witness (10._____) Armstrong. 1.[A]why[B]what[C]how[D]which….請幫我解說=>[C]how=>用此作關係代名詞,以表如何作....動作

    2.[A]help[B]helping[C]helped[D]to help….請幫我解說=>[C]helped應與became時態相同用過去式3.[A]win[B]beat[C]get[D]fight=>[C]get,get important cases接到一些重要案件4.[A]protect[B]defend[C]accusing[D]changing….請幫我解說=>前面用was故後面只可以加現在分詞或過去分詞,剩[C]accusing[D]changing可選之情況下,因林肯是為被告辯護不可選[C]accusing故要選[D]changing5.[A]by name[B]named[C]naming[D]in the name of….請幫我解說=>[B]named, a man named Duff Armstrong用過去分詞表被動式”被命名”即”名叫….的人”6.[A]prosecuting[B]prosecute[C]prosecuted[D]prosecution….請幫我解說=>[A]prosecuting, The prosecuting attorney's witness=>原告律師之證人,用現在分詞當形容詞prosecuting=>告發的,7[A]under[B]below[C]beneath[D]in=>in the moonlight用in沒有理由,必須強記

    2012-07-09 16:28:43 補充:

    8.[A]at[B]in[C]on[D]while =>at the night of the murder 用at沒有理由,必須強記

    2012-07-09 16:29:33 補充:

    9.[A]proved[B]reproach[C]approved[D]approached=>[A]proved與brought時態才一致=>prove證明

    2012-07-09 16:35:24 補充:

    10[D]to have identified=> for the witness to have identified Armstrong.

    for…to讓…能…因為identify在此要表過去完成的是,而前面有to故要用原型have

    2012-07-09 16:35:59 補充:

    原律師的見證人(The prosecuting attorney's witness)說他在謀殺案當晚( at the night of the murder)於月光底下(in the moonlight)t很清楚看到Armstrong的臉(he saw/ seen(舊用法) Armstrong's face clearly)

    2012-07-09 16:36:17 補充:

    Linocln brought an almanac and proved in court that there was not enough moonlight that night for the witness to have identified Armstrong.

    他帶著曆書到庭證明當晚的月光 (依照曆書可以知道當晚接近滿月的程度)並不足以亮到讓證人明確認出是Armstrong.

    註:(7._____) the moonlight (8.______)the light(x) of the murder=>night(o)

    2012-07-09 16:42:38 補充:

    更正=>3.[A]win[B]beat[C]get[D]fight.=>[A]win,WIN important cases打贏一些重要官司

    2012-07-09 16:54:03 補充:

    Once he was (4._____) a man

    最理想的答案應為DEFENDING

    但題目無此選項

    正確寫法Once he defended a man named Armstrong....

    題目應有誤!

    2012-07-10 11:20:28 補充:

    Sorry 第二題" No,you lost me"="No,I don't understand"(O)

    至於win important cases是對的!!!

    http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/newsevents/2005-arch...

    因為這是講打贏很多官司的情況不是只有打官司而已

    2012-07-10 11:21:50 補充:

    多謝小羊的指正也未答錯的題道歉``~II~"

    參考資料: Geoffrey好累~II~
  • 小羊
    Lv 6
    8 年前

    阿興 抱歉 回答的有點慢, 也感激 Geoffrey 的回答

    第二題: 答案應該是A.

    Do you understand what i said? 你明白我剛說什麼嗎?

    No, you lost me , 我跟丟你了

    這邊的意思是說, 我試圖跟上你的意思, 不過還是跟丟了

    2012-07-10 01:00:42 補充:

    第三題 我覺得應該用 fight

    打官司, 美國這邊也都是用 fight case(s)

    智慧能幫被告 為了正義而戰, 而不是 為了 勝利 而戰, 所以用 fight 成分比較大些.

    2012-07-11 00:17:41 補充:

    win /fight .. 很有爭議的題目.. 我是單看 多益在考的 應該是考 打官司 這個打字..

    題意是 "智慧"能幫助他打許多"重要"的官司.. 如果用"win" 的話..感覺 用點

    win important cases and lose for other normal cases?

    所以用 fight 的話 就是說 在 fight important case 當中, 他的智慧用上了.

    謝謝 Geoffrey 的交流與 連結..很有力的 reference ..

  • 8 年前

    Geoffrey抱歉呀!

    第四題你說對了,我defend少打了ing>

    2012-07-09 18:58:55 補充:

    你真的好厲害呀!很佩服你^^

    看的很細微!

    2012-07-10 09:05:05 補充:

    小羊 也超感謝你幫我補充你的看法!

    謝謝~~~

還有問題?馬上發問,尋求解答。