If you have the option of sentencing someone to the electric chair or inducing totalamnesia, which would you decide? Is total amnesia more humane? Would it truly erase all memories? These are the questions that will swirl around the person who invents the first total amnesia inducer.
Much like formatting the hard drive of a computer, the amnesia inducer will erase all memories in the human brain. People going through this process will have to start from ground zero, relearning how to eat, walk, talk, read, and write all over
again. But it will still be portrayed as a more humane ( 38) to the death penalty.
Partial amnesia inducers, which erase only the past few days of someone’s memory, will have application in erasing the lasting memory of a person traumatized by such things as a brutal crime, the ravages of war, or child abuse.
38 A. dejection B. solution C. inspiration D. attraction
請問第38題 為何是選B 解釋得越詳細 給點數喔 ^^
- DaSaGwaLv 78 年前最佳解答
As we all know, electric chair is a method of death penalty. In this article, it brought up another method as an alternative and more humane way. It refers as a method, therefore, it is logical to use "solution" in the context. We can easily eliminate choice (A) and (D), because they don't fit the context. "inspiration" only refers to an "idea" rising from something or someone, hence, it is NOT a good choice.
2013-01-09 14:38:34 補充：
我們都知道，電椅是死刑的一種 ”方法”。在這篇文章中,提出了一種替代 ”方法”， 一種更人性化的方式。它指的是一種方法 ，因此使用“solution” 是符合上下文的 意思 。我們可以很容易地踢除（A）和（D）選擇，因為它們不符合上下文。“inspiration(靈感)”是指從某事或某人所導致的念頭，因此，它是不是一個好的選擇。
2013-01-09 14:41:53 補充：
The above Chinese typing is done by my son! I am not able to type Chinese!參考資料： self