1 Differing in the theorizing of the 1940s and 1950s
2 Unlike the theorizing of the 1940s and 1950s
3 For it differs in the theorizing of the 1940s and 1950s
4Doing differently in the theorizing of the 1940s and 1950s
which one is correct
我想問1 3 4 文法錯在那??
- DaSaGwaLv 77 年前最佳解答
This is part of 國立彰化師範大學 master program's entrance exam test question. However, its original is
from a book:
Teaching the Conflicts
Neal Stephenson’s Cryptonomicon and The Baroque Cycle
In part the theoretical drive is an extension of the professionalizing and systematising impulse that dates back to the beginnings of academic literary study in the 1940s. Unlike the theorizing of the 1940s and 1950s, however, the most prominent theories since the 1960s have sought not to consolidate and rationalise existing professional procedures and assumptions but to challenge and deconstruct them.
2013-07-09 14:47:42 補充：
If you want to see its entire paragraph. It is at p.190.
2013-07-09 20:52:02 補充：
besides (3), needs to be: For its differing in theorizing ... (because "for" cannot lead a clause)
The rest has NO grammatical error, but (1) and (4) don't fit the context. Please read the paragraph I have posted, you will see.
- prisoner26535Lv 77 年前
None of them is a complete sentence.
- ShuangLv 77 年前
3. is correct. 因為在1940s and 1950s 年代中的理論化，就它而言是不同的：理由是 it differs 指出不同，而用 For 表目的‧
2013-07-09 15:58:30 補充：
okay, correct it since it is original source.
2013-07-09 16:04:36 補充：
你的題目是下文，很難判定出來，應該是post 整段句子，才能從上文中看出也！這就是斷章取義最要不得的地方也！參考資料： me, me, me