關於被動語態，連接詞後面的被動句vs主動句拜託幫忙

Question

The butterflies were marked and realeased from Taipei.  句中realeased前面不用再加were.  但是如果把realeased改成flew away,flew away是主動用法，所以它的前面也不用加were。

所以...兩句連接詞後面的動詞前面都不用加連接詞，但是一個是主動用法，一個是被動用法...怎麼會這樣呢?

應該要有一個區別方法吧


1.請務必回答有根據的正確文法
2.請說明連接詞後面的動詞前面如果用被動語態是否要再加be動詞?

Louis · Accepted Answer

The butterflies were marked and released from Taipei.
＝ The butterflies were marked and (then they were) released from Taipei.
對等連接詞所連結的文字在語法上必是同類的（對應的是兩個過去分詞marked vs released），所以助動詞were只要寫一個。

2013-11-30 11:16:44 補充：
如果把realeased改成flew away，會造成語法錯誤：flew不是過去分詞，是過去式。

2013-11-30 11:20:04 補充：
本句因為未出現by ...，所以動詞的被動意味不強烈。你可以把marked and released from Taipei視為主詞補語（用表示被動的過去分詞當補語）。
marked的地點不一定是Taipei。但released的地點一定是Taipei。

2013-11-30 20:47:37 補充：
The butterflies were marked and then they were flew away from Taipei.
是錯誤的因為flew是fly的過去式，你不能在其前面加上一個were當助動詞
此外，蝴蝶是自己飛走的，你不能用被動態動詞．

After being marked, the butterlies flew away from Taipei.是正確的寫法。

2013-11-30 20:48:26 補充：
Having been marked, the butterflies flew away from Taipei.也是正確的寫法．

typo: butterflies

呆子 · Answer

1.  The butterflies were marked and realeased from Taipei. 句中marked and realeased共用助動詞were. 但是如果把realeased改成flew away主動用法，因為有先後順序〈先做記號再飛走，主動與被動無法共用，這是邏輯問題〉。需寫成After having been marked, the butterflies flew away.2.  若無先後順序而是同時發生，就可主動與被動共用。例如：Some protesters were seen setting objects on fire.3.  你的問題頗有創意，向學精神令人欽佩

TOMING88 · Answer

The butterflies were marked and be released from Taipei.
were marked,(be released)=2 passive voice.by somebody;
be=have a state or quality where was=,singular  ; were= plural.

關於被動語態，連接詞後面的被動句vs主動句 拜託幫忙

3 個解答

關於被動語態，連接詞後面的被動句vs主動句拜託幫忙