promotion image of download ymail app
Promoted
小夜 發問時間: 社會與文化語言 · 4 年前

這是我在書上看到的: all was not peaceful and disharmony wasn't confined to the political area. 這句怎麼會有兩個動詞??

2 個解答

評分
  • 4 年前
    最佳解答

    all was not peaceful and disharmony wasn't confined to the political area.

    我認為此是正確的。

    因"was not peaceful and disharmony" 在修飾 "all" 1字。

    "all was not peaceful and disharmony"為1名詞子句,名詞或名詞子句之後加否定之be動詞,是正確之陳述方式,在文法上並無錯誤。

    • ...顯示所有留言
    • Kookie
      Lv 5
      4 年前檢舉

      提供原文出處,難道不足採信。寧可相信中文書惡劣剽竊,卻連內容都不校訂。
      如果要用子句的寫法如下:
      1.) All THAT was not peaceful and disharmony WEREN'T confined to the political arena.
      這個 that 不可省。並且句意和原文不同。

      2.) What was not peaceful and disharmony wasn't confined to the political arena.
      這才是名詞子句的寫法,而句意也和原文不同。
      Kookie · 17 小時前

    • Commenter avatar登入以對解答發表意見
  • Kookie
    Lv 5
    4 年前

    (發問時,請提供完整句子,不要截取段落,任何人能夠由版大所提供的片段了解語意,是自欺欺人,妄自猜測)

    原句如下:

    While the healing of the rift between North and South did make progress, all was not peaceful and the disharmony wasn’t confined to the political arena.

    僅管療癒南北兩方的裂痕確有進展,並非一概平和,而其紛爭也非僅限於政治場域。

    下面兩個句子,用and 連接。

    1.) all was not peace

    2.) the disharmony wasn't confined to the political arena

    注意: 版大的原句有兩處"嚴重"錯誤

    1.) the disharmony

    2.) arena 而非area.

    http://www.thechoicemaker.com/uploads/2/5/0/7/2507...

    • Commenter avatar登入以對解答發表意見
還有問題?馬上發問,尋求解答。