發問時間: 社會與文化語言 · 2 年前

請問"Leo has never be lazy,has he?"中的 be為何不是用been呢?

2 個解答

評分
  • Jenkin
    Lv 7
    2 年前
    最佳解答

    問得非常好。

    除了這個問題外,但假這按照文法結構這附帶問句式(tag question)", has he"亦應該錯了,前句是He has "....",因此後句的tag question便應該是反詞的, hasn't he?

    "never been lazy"是一組意思的"從不懶散",並不等同He has not been lazy這種說明句式"不曾懶散",因此寫句用詞是要按意擇詞的,這樣的說法才能寫tag question:He has not been lazy, has he?因為"不曾"(has not)是動詞注明的時間性,但是原句has never been lazy就像是說has been "never lazy",所以不是has not而是has一個說明他的"否定情況",所以附問句便應是, hasn't he?意思是反問"他真不是"從沒有這樣"?

    never be lazy 必錯了。

  • 2 年前

    Positive tag follows negative statement(=never been lazy).

    positive tag=has he?

    Present perfect tense denotes present results of past actions. Note never is used;

    Error and correction:-eg:-

    Leo has never been lazy.

    Leo has never (be)---incorrect in the usage of the present perfect tense.

    • TOMING88
      Lv 7
      2 年前檢舉

      It is correct indeed for me. +1.
      Thanks from prisoner26535.

還有問題?馬上發問,尋求解答。